2003
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2003/v26i3/020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Lagoon of Venice: geological setting, evolution and land subsidence

Abstract: The paper deals with the geological setting, history and subsidence of the Venetian Plain. Major attention is paid to the Pleistocene-Holocene stratigraphic sequence in the Lagoon of Venice, in relation to its origin that dates back to 6-7 kyr BP. Geological land subsidence, which played an important role in the origin and the evolution of the lagoon, and anthropogenic subsidence, that has recently assumed a major importance for the Venetian environment, are discussed. Considering also the sea level rise, 23 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of flood intensity and frequency observed in Venice in the second half of the 20th century has been caused by anthropogenic land settlement during the 1950s and 1960s as a result of groundwater withdrawals mainly for industrial use in the nearby mainland [ Gambolati et al , 1974; Carbognin et al , 1977] superimposed on the natural subsidence of the coastal area [ Brambati et al , 2003] and the sea level rise due to global climate change [ Carbognin and Taroni , 1996]. These factors have caused an overall relative loss in elevation of 23 cm over the last 100 years [ Carbognin et al , 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase of flood intensity and frequency observed in Venice in the second half of the 20th century has been caused by anthropogenic land settlement during the 1950s and 1960s as a result of groundwater withdrawals mainly for industrial use in the nearby mainland [ Gambolati et al , 1974; Carbognin et al , 1977] superimposed on the natural subsidence of the coastal area [ Brambati et al , 2003] and the sea level rise due to global climate change [ Carbognin and Taroni , 1996]. These factors have caused an overall relative loss in elevation of 23 cm over the last 100 years [ Carbognin et al , 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average relative elevation loss of the city can be estimated at 23 cm over the last century, with sea level rise and land settlement contributing 11 and 12 cm, respectively [ Carbognin et al , 2004]. Recent monitoring surveys indicate that today, Venice is almost stable, being subject to natural land subsidence only (on the order of 0.5–0.7 mm yr −1 ) [ Gambolati and Teatini , 1998; Tosi et al , 2002; Brambati et al , 2003]. Tide measurements performed in the northern Adriatic point to a mean sea level rise of 1.5 mm yr −1 over the last 30 years [ Carbognin et al , 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question is: what means “general/substantial stability” for the historical center of Venice? Surely, it does not correspond to null displacements as geological subsidence has always driven the evolution of this region [ Brambati et al , 2003]. Indeed, we have always associated this concept to the detection of a significant number of leveling benchmarks (in the past) or PS (more recently) distributed in the whole city characterized by sinking rates comparable with the long‐term regional geological subsidence estimated, for example, in 0.5–1.0 mm/yr by Carminati et al [2003].…”
Section: Is Venice “Subsiding” or “Substantially “Stable”mentioning
confidence: 99%