2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02579088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lagrange approach to infinite linear programs

Abstract: Infinite linear programs, convex problems, Lagrange approach, strong duality, 90C46, 90C25, 90C08,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of upper-bound is given below. Since we have (47) From the definition of constant , we have (48) As a result, where the last inequality is because of (47) and (48). This completes the proof.…”
Section: Appendix G Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of upper-bound is given below. Since we have (47) From the definition of constant , we have (48) As a result, where the last inequality is because of (47) and (48). This completes the proof.…”
Section: Appendix G Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As a remark, note that the per-stage delay penalty and perstage packet drop penalty are regular cost functions as defined in [46], [47]. The proof of the statement (b) is given as follows.…”
Section: Claim A-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a different and yet related infinite dimensional linear program (see also Gabriel, López-Martínez, and Hernández-Lerma 2001). As in Anderson and Nash (1987), the solvability of problem (D) cannot be settled using an argument similar to that in Theorem A.1 because the space of continuous functions on a compact set is not the dual of any normed space.…”
Section: Proof the Positive Cone Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%