2006
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The lagrangian origin of MHV rules

Abstract: We construct a canonical transformation that takes the usual Yang-Mills action into one whose Feynman diagram expansion generates the MHV rules. The off-shell continuation appears as a natural consequence of using light-front quantisation surfaces. The construction extends to include massless fermions.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
274
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
274
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are left with This is a clear point of contrast from Yang-Mills theory where both the pure and maximally supersymmetric theories are described by quadratic form structures composed of covariant derivatives [1]. From the MHV literature [15][16][17][18][19][20], we know that all treelevel scattering amplitudes in Yang-Mills theory may be expressed entirely in terms of the "square" or "angular" brackets. In gravity, the cubic amplitude does indeed have the same property but the quartic and higher vertices involve a mixture of both brackets.The derivatives we have introduced in the quadratic form for gravity do not transform covariantly beyond order κ and this is very likely, another way of stating what the amplitude structures have already taught us.…”
Section: Transformation Properties Of Dhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are left with This is a clear point of contrast from Yang-Mills theory where both the pure and maximally supersymmetric theories are described by quadratic form structures composed of covariant derivatives [1]. From the MHV literature [15][16][17][18][19][20], we know that all treelevel scattering amplitudes in Yang-Mills theory may be expressed entirely in terms of the "square" or "angular" brackets. In gravity, the cubic amplitude does indeed have the same property but the quartic and higher vertices involve a mixture of both brackets.The derivatives we have introduced in the quadratic form for gravity do not transform covariantly beyond order κ and this is very likely, another way of stating what the amplitude structures have already taught us.…”
Section: Transformation Properties Of Dhmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for the derivation of the CSW rules introduced in [17,18] and applied to quarks in [25] uses the light-cone approach to Yang-Mills theory. In this section the treatment of massive quarks in light-cone Yang-Mills is reviewed and streamlined compared to [25].…”
Section: Light-cone Qcd and Scalar Diagrams With Massive Quarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate massive quarks it is convenient to follow closely the setup used in the construction of soft-collinear effective theory [30] for massive quarks [31]. The treatment of quarks in [17,25] emerges as a special case for the choice n ± = 2 −1/2 (1, 0, 0, ±1). A Dirac spinor Ψ and it's conjugate are decomposed as…”
Section: Light-cone Qcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a development initiated by Mansfield [10] and pushed further by Ettle and Morris [11], the starting point is the lightcone Yang-Mills Lagrangian. In terms of helicities, the action roughly takes the form…”
Section: Canonical Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%