The Landscape of Inappropriate Laboratory Testing: A 15-Year Meta-Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundLaboratory testing is the single highest-volume medical activity and drives clinical decision-making across medicine. However, the overall landscape of inappropriate testing, which is thought to be dominated by repeat testing, is unclear. Systematic differences in initial vs. repeat testing, measurement criteria, and other factors would suggest new priorities for improving laboratory testing.MethodsA multi-database systematic review was performed on published studies from 1997–2012 using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Over- vs. underutilization, initial vs. repeat testing, low- vs. high-volume testing, subjective vs. objective appropriateness criteria, and restrictive vs. permissive appropriateness criteria, among other factors, were assessed.ResultsOverall mean rates of over- and underutilization were 20.6% (95% CI 16.2–24.9%) and 44.8% (95% CI 33.8–55.8%). Overutilization during initial testing (43.9%; 95% CI 35.4–52.5%) was six times higher than during repeat testing (7.4%; 95% CI 2.5–12.3%; P for stratum difference <0.001). Overutilization of low-volume tests (32.2%; 95% CI 25.0–39.4%) was three times that of high-volume tests (10.2%; 95% CI 2.6–17.7%; P<0.001). Overutilization measured according to restrictive criteria (44.2%; 95% CI 36.8–51.6%) was three times higher than for permissive criteria (12.0%; 95% CI 8.0–16.0%; P<0.001). Overutilization measured using subjective criteria (29.0%; 95% CI 21.9–36.1%) was nearly twice as high as for objective criteria (16.1%; 95% CI 11.0–21.2%; P = 0.004). Together, these factors explained over half (54%) of the overall variability in overutilization. There were no statistically significant differences between studies from the United States vs. elsewhere (P = 0.38) or among chemistry, hematology, microbiology, and molecular tests (P = 0.05–0.65) and no robust statistically significant trends over time.ConclusionsThe landscape of overutilization varies systematically by clinical setting (initial vs. repeat), test volume, and measurement criteria. Underutilization is also widespread, but understudied. Expanding the current focus on reducing repeat testing to include ordering the right test during initial evaluation may lead to fewer errors and better care.

Inappropriateness in laboratory medicine: an elephant in the room?

“…Approximately 34% of the overall inappropriateness could be attributed to over-utilization. A reliable estimate of inappropriate laboratory testing has recently been provided by a multi-database systematic review, using keywords such as "utilization" and "laboratory test (s)" (8). The pooled results of this meta-analysis showed that the mean rates of overuse and underuse of laboratory testing were as high as 21% and 45%, with overutilization of in vitro diagnostics approximating 44% during initial testing.…”

The risks of defensive (emergency) medicine. The laboratory perspective

“…[5][6][7] In a survey performed on a random sample of physicians practicing in six high risk specialties, 8 Studdert and colleagues reported that 59% of physicians ordered unnecessary diagnostic tests or procedures due to defensive medicine. Another recent survey of the Italian Agency for Regional Healthcare Systems (Agenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali; AGE-NAS) based on over 1500 hospital physicians revealed that 58% of them admitted to practice defensive medicine and, even more importantly, as many as 93% of hospital physicians were not considering of suspending or reducing this practice.…”

An Example for Investigation of Unnecessary Laboratory Testing: Free PSA Test

“…Bu ölçülebilir parametrelerden birisi de gereksiz test istemidir. Gereksiz test isteminin testlerin aşırı kullanımı veya yetersiz kullanımı, gereksiz başlangıç test istemi ve gereksiz test yinelemesi gibi birkaç farklı tipi bulunmaktadır (4) . Prostat kanseri için bir serum belirteci olarak total prostat spesifik antijenin (tPSA) klinik yararı kanıt-lanmış olmasına karşın kusursuz bir belirteç değildir.…”