Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose 2005
DOI: 10.5871/bacad/9780197263327.003.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Language and Style of the Fragmentary Republican Historians

Abstract: This chapter starts by describing the nature of the evidence of the language and style of the fragmentary republican historians. It also refers to a number of usages which are absent, or virtually absent, from Cicero and Caesar: some of these are found in Latin – primarily, of course, in poetry – of a time before that of the historian concerned, while others occur for the first time in the author in question. The chapter specifically discusses archaisms and neologisms. It also reports the successors of Cato I.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We reasoned that markers of hypotactic style (extensive use of subordinate clauses) might be particularly important, because the earlier historians on whom Livy drew are generally held to have favored a simpler sentence structure (parataxis) in contrast to Livy's more varied and hierarchical syntax (60). Consistent with this hypothesis, we identified five features (mean sentence length, variance of sentence length, fraction of noninterrogative sentences containing at least one relative clause, mean length of relative clauses, and mean number of relative clauses per sentence) sufficient to establish a clear difference between citational and noncitational material (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Anomaly Detection Differentiates Suspected Citations From Othermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reasoned that markers of hypotactic style (extensive use of subordinate clauses) might be particularly important, because the earlier historians on whom Livy drew are generally held to have favored a simpler sentence structure (parataxis) in contrast to Livy's more varied and hierarchical syntax (60). Consistent with this hypothesis, we identified five features (mean sentence length, variance of sentence length, fraction of noninterrogative sentences containing at least one relative clause, mean length of relative clauses, and mean number of relative clauses per sentence) sufficient to establish a clear difference between citational and noncitational material (SI Appendix, Fig.…”
Section: Anomaly Detection Differentiates Suspected Citations From Othermentioning
confidence: 99%