The Native Languages of South America 1920
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107360105.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The languages of South America: deep families, areal relationships, and language contact

Abstract: After summarizing the earlier chapters, we sketch a general overview of the different phases in the development of South America. We then explore the possibility of a continental bias for typological features characteristic of South America, which may point to the early entry of a limited set of features into the continent. Subsequently we analyze possible deep families or macro-groups in the continent, and their regional distribution. We then turn to the issue of whether different subsets of structural featur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 299 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the broad lowland region of the Amazon basin, the Orinoco, and the Guianas, the late Holocene is widely regarded as a crucial timeframe for the amplification of anthropic landscape transformations [1][2][3]; the emergence of long-lived and widespread archaeological traditions [4]; and the diversification of important indigenous language families [5][6][7]. These and other processes, including increased social integration [8] and agricultural intensification [9][10][11][12][13], cannot be explained through appeal to mechanistic cause and effect nor detached from historical contingency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the broad lowland region of the Amazon basin, the Orinoco, and the Guianas, the late Holocene is widely regarded as a crucial timeframe for the amplification of anthropic landscape transformations [1][2][3]; the emergence of long-lived and widespread archaeological traditions [4]; and the diversification of important indigenous language families [5][6][7]. These and other processes, including increased social integration [8] and agricultural intensification [9][10][11][12][13], cannot be explained through appeal to mechanistic cause and effect nor detached from historical contingency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, a good number of languages with postverbal negation cluster in areas. Three geographic areas stand out as hubs of postverbal negation: the 'Macro-Sudan Belt' in Africa (Güldemann 2007), New Guinea (Reesink 2002;Klamer et al 2008: 130;Vossen 2016: 121, 321), and the continent of South America as a macro-area (Dryer 2013a;Muysken et al 5. Munro (1974: 68) gives -mot as the negative suffix; however, she notes that the -t-is "the ubiquitous 'emphatic' , which has been effectively fused to the negative in Mojave and several other Yuman languages".…”
Section: Acquiring Postverbal Negation Through Language Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesis is that this concerns only the most unstable features, because if it concerned every feature the entire profiles would have converged. To get an idea of which features are likely to be inherently stable versus unstable, we take over the stability measure calculated in Muysken et al (2014). This essentially measures the probability that a feature value remains the same in the transition from a proto-language to a modern language within a language family.…”
Section: Riverine Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%