Clearly, this study confirms that neostigmine alone does not enhance respiratory safety and may actually be harmful when given in high doses (>60 μg/kg) and when given in the absence of neuromuscular transmission monitoring. Administering neostigmine to a patient who has spontaneously recovered from ND-NMBA may cause a depolarizing neuromuscular block with no TOF fade. In addition, incomplete reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade exposes the patient to a prolonged period of respiratory muscle weakness. It is unsafe to administer neostigmine to a patient who has spontaneously recovered from neuromuscular blockade because neostigmine dose-dependently affects respiratory muscle function and increases upper airway collapsibility. Indeed, both residual neuromuscular blockade and neostigmineinduced neuromuscular blockade cause upper airway dilator muscle dysfunction resulting in upper airway obstruction, which can produce negative-pressure pulmonary edema.The current investigators, who are affiliated with an excellent, highly respected institution, commented that despite the widespread availability of both qualitative and quantitative neuromuscular transmission monitoring in their hospital 1 of 5 patients who received an ND-NMBA did not have a single TOF count recorded! This overconfidence and overreliance on clinical intuition are grossly inappropriate in an era when we are admonished to practice evidence-based medicine. Unwarranted use of neostigmine and neostigmine administration without the guidance of appropriate monitoring tools can result in preventable respiratory morbidity in our patients. Surely, our patients deserve better "care." Comment by Kathryn E. McGoldrick, MD, FCAI(Hon) Disclosure: The author declares no conflict of interest.