1962
DOI: 10.4159/harvard.9780674600058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Law of Labour Relations in Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The settlement procedure encompassed three levels, ending with a conciliation court. Unlike dispute settlement systems in several other countries (for instance, in Sweden: Gustafsson, 1965;Schmidt, 1962), its recommendations were mandatory. The agreement did not regu late substantive employment conditions (unlike central agreements in Sweden: see Leimgruber, 2008); negotiations about these topics were to take place at the local firm level.…”
Section: The Peace Agreement a Distinctive Swiss Labour Market Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The settlement procedure encompassed three levels, ending with a conciliation court. Unlike dispute settlement systems in several other countries (for instance, in Sweden: Gustafsson, 1965;Schmidt, 1962), its recommendations were mandatory. The agreement did not regu late substantive employment conditions (unlike central agreements in Sweden: see Leimgruber, 2008); negotiations about these topics were to take place at the local firm level.…”
Section: The Peace Agreement a Distinctive Swiss Labour Market Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in the 1970s did the situation begin to change in Sweden with the introduction of statutory regulations. However, the impetus for reform did not come from their union leaderships as sometimes contended in the literature (see, for example, Emmenegger, 2014;Korpi, 1982;Lindbeck, 1997;Schmidt, 1977). As will be shown, it was the government who spearheaded the push for statutory rules, albeit in the face of considerable resistance from both sides of industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%