The leadership trilogy: A review of the third decade of The Leadership Quarterly

Gardner, William L.; Lowe, Kevin B.; Meuser, Jeremy D.; Noghani, Farzaneh; Gullifor, Daniel P.; Cogliser, Claudia C.

doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101379

Cited by 91 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 124 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous studies and extensive subject literature offer deep insights into leadership and its effect on an organization's success (Lord et al, 2017;Natalicchio et al, 2017;Parris and Peachey, 2013;Posner, 2015;Karaszewski, 2010). Review studies, mostly using the systematic literature review method (Gardner et al, 2020;Dinh et al, 2014;Harrison et al, 2016;Landells and Albrecht, 2017;Oc, 2018;Yahaya and Ebrahim, 2016), explore the individual aspects associated with the importance of characteristics of modern leaders, and the effectiveness of various leadership styles.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership Styles and Employee Expectations

Drewniak¹,

Drewniak²,

Posadzińska³

2020

ERSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Leadership Styles and Employee Expectations

Drewniak¹,

Drewniak²,

Posadzińska³

2020

ERSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition, Gardner et al (2020) by referring to the publication in The Leadership Forum for the period 1990-2019 map out several leadership issues that are important to be examined in the future as a response to the existing discourse. The map made by Gardner et al is in line with the increase in the discourse on disruptive leadership.…”

Section: Results and Discussion The Relation Of The Idea Of Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mainstreaming Idea: Alternative Reading of State and Civil Society Relation in Policy Making

Seftyono¹,

Santoso

Darwin

et al. 2020

CosmoGov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientific climate as the unity of ideas and the activator of an organization is suspected to be a form of civil society leadership. It moves from the personification of actors to the debate of ideas. Civil society as a political movement is a study that still being debated because of its position when faced with the state and policy. This article provides a different review, by carrying out the phenomenon of research-based policy in Indonesia. Through qualitative data tracking, it was shown that some civil society did not put themselves in these two positions, namely as the opponent or the partner for the government. Furthermore, the reality showed that both of them, in this case civil society and the state were more concerned with the realization of their ideas, the openness, and the professionalism of publications to support policy making. More specifically, the existence of openness and implementation of science and information as a collaborative arena appeared from the interaction of the National Development Planning Agency and Knowledge Sector Initiative which had been running since 2011 in building the ecosystem of Research-Based Policy. Then, it was followed by the presence of Open Science community in 2017 and the establishment of National Research and Innovation Agency in 2019. Therefore, both collaborations encouraged the creation of a data openness climate in policy making. This was a general 'norm', but it did not work fully. Therefore, this article provides a space that the opportunities to strengthen the ecosystem of research-based policy can be optimized by setting out the idea approach and makes the civil society goes beyond the institutional barrier.

show abstract

“…Vi ser først de aller siste årene at en form for post-heroisk tenkning utfordrer teorier med forankring i tradisjonell tenkning om ledelse i organisasjoner på 1900-tallet. Gardner og kollegaer har gjort en gjennomgang av hvilke ledelsesteorier som er mest publiserte gjennom tre tiår, i periodene 1990-1999, 2000-2009 og 2010-2019, i The Leadership Quarterly (Lowe & Gardner, 2000;Gardner, Lowe, Moss, Mahoney & Cogliser, 2010;Gardner et al, 2020). Forfatterne beskriver at mens de to første tiårene (1990-1999 og 2000-2009) viser begrenset utvikling i innhold, tema og metodisk tilnaerming, så ser vi i den siste perioden (2010-2019) at ledelsesforskningen går i retning av å beskrive vår forståelse av ledelse som fenomen, og hvordan vi metodisk kan studere ledelse, så vel som praktiske implikasjoner (Gardner et al, 2020, s. 24).…”

Section: Den Heroiske Arvenunclassified

Selvledelse som mulighet i kunnskapsorganisasjoner: Trengs andre selvledelsesstrategier?

Drake¹

2020

Ledelse Av Mennesker I Det Nye Arbeidslivet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self-leadership is an increasingly current topic, not only for the sake of scholarly study and research, but not least for practical application in modern organizations. The fundamental idea of self-leadership is that employees can take on responsibility for many of the influence processes normally carried out by leaders and leadership systems. Knowledge workers is a category of employees who might be particularily in need of self-leadership, as their work is typically unstructured, cognitively taxing, and requires the right kind of mix between alone time and extensive collaboration. How to prioritize the right types of tasks, make sure to involve the right people at the right time and protect oneself from collaboration overload, generosity burnout or other types of overwork, are examples of dilemmas facing knowledge workers in their everyday working lives. Research and theoretical contributions addressing the particular concerns and needs related to knowledge workers’ self-leadership, however, are limited. In this chapter, we discuss some of the most pressing issues in relation to self-leadership by knowledge workers and present several strategies that may assist and equip them with suitable self-leadership skills and capabilities. One of the main takeouts from this review is that behavioral and structural strategies should be prioritized over cognitive ones. Moreover, senior and experienced workers should make more use of the autonomy available to them by making sure they work in a sustainable manner, as well as role-modeling such behaviors and serving as coaches and mentors for more inexperienced workers.

show abstract

The leadership trilogy: A review of the third decade of The Leadership Quarterly

Cited by 91 publications

References 124 publications

Leadership Styles and Employee Expectations

Leadership Styles and Employee Expectations

Mainstreaming Idea: Alternative Reading of State and Civil Society Relation in Policy Making

Selvledelse som mulighet i kunnskapsorganisasjoner: Trengs andre selvledelsesstrategier?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About