1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0097-8493(97)00048-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The legibility of screen formats: Are three columns better than one?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
1
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
24
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, no differences in comprehension have been found using this method (Dyson and Kipping 1998a,b). However, a difference in comprehension across the three formats was found when readers were divided into faster and slower readers (Dyson and Kipping 1997). In the three column paged format, comprehension was better for faster readers than slower readers.…”
Section: One Vs Three Columnsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Generally, no differences in comprehension have been found using this method (Dyson and Kipping 1998a,b). However, a difference in comprehension across the three formats was found when readers were divided into faster and slower readers (Dyson and Kipping 1997). In the three column paged format, comprehension was better for faster readers than slower readers.…”
Section: One Vs Three Columnsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A comparison of one and three columns was made by Dyson and Kipping (1997) measuring reading rate and comprehension. The texts were chosen to be typical of what might be found in online magazines, with passages of a little under 2000 words taken from New Scientist.…”
Section: One Vs Three Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A column should not be very narrow. Narrow columns have got negative effects on readability [Dyson and Kipping 1997;Dyson and Haselgrove 2001].…”
Section: Each Column Must Be Y-monotone This Ensures That Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we are currently considering an option to reduce font size for text presented in narrow columns. This is based on findings by DYSON and KIPPING [1997] that the negative effects of narrow columns may be reduced by a reduction of the font size: The rationale here is that the negative effects of narrow columns arise from the small number of characters on a line. This effect can therefore be reversed by using a smaller font size.…”
Section: Problem Of Narrow Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%