The Li6(d, α)α reaction

Reanalysis of the astrophysicalS(E) factors of the6Li(d,α)4He,7Li(p,α)4He and6Li(p,α)3He reactions

“…The experimental data reanalyzed in this work are taken from [11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. For the experimental data taken from [11], the molecular H 2 or D 2 gas target data of each reaction do not include the normalization factors k = 0.93, 0.99 and 0.93 given in [11], and the errors are assumed to be as given in table 1 of [11], without the additional errors mentioned in the footnotes to that table.…”

“…In this work, based on the hypothesis that the screening effects are independent of the isotopic effects and the fact that the screening effects depend on the environments, we reanalyze the experimental data of the 6 Li(d,α) 4 He, 7 Li(p,α) 4 He and 6 Li(p,α) 3 He reactions obtained by other groups [11,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] in the high-and low-energy region, simultaneously. A polynomial energy dependence form is involved in our reanalysis process to fit the astrophysical S bare (E) factor of each reaction, and the parameters in this polynomial form are varied together with other parameters and U s provided by the environments (LiF solid targets and molecular H 2 or D 2 gas targets) to fit the experimental data of the 6 Li(d,α) 4 He, 7 Li(p,α) 4 He and 6 Li(p,α) 3 He reactions in high-and low-energy region, simultaneously.…”

The4He(?,p)7Li,7Li*0.478 reaction near threshold

“…The coefficients are strongly correlated and the error hyperellipsoid is skewed. The inverse reaction studied at Saclay and Rice [12] shows correlated variations of the coefficients of factors of three and more over this energy range Fig, 10. Cross sections for the proton channels: 7Li+p is given by dots, 7Li*~ +p is given by upright triangles.…”

Reaction rates of proton and deuteron induced reactions on lithium

“…[6] were taken. Finally, for SLi(d,a)4He, the data of Jeronymo et al [7], McClenahan et al [8] and Pdsler at al. [9] were utilized.…”

“…The cross sections of ref. [7] also have to be divided by a factor of two. The numerical integration was carried to sufficiently high energies that the integrand had decreased by at least a factor of 103 from its maximum value.…”