2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The likely effects of river impoundment on beta-diversity of a floodplain zooplankton metacommunity

Abstract: NCON 21 1-7 Please cite this article in press as: Soares, C.E.A., et al., The likely effects of river impoundment on beta-diversity of a floodplain zooplankton metacommunity. Nat Conservacao. 2015. http://dx.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the composition of ecological communities (bdiversity) could occur due to the replacement of some species by others among communities (turnover), or differences in species richness, wherein the species in one community are a subset of the species in another community (nestedness), or the joint action of both (Baselga & Leprieur, 2015). Most of the heterogeneous environments exhibit higher taxonomic b-diversity than homogeneous environments (Bozelli et al, 2015;Soares et al, 2015), but it is uncertain how environmental homogenisation affects functional b-diversity (Ricotta & Burrascano, 2008;Swenson, 2011), which is based on the differences in functional traits of the species (Diaz & Cabido, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the composition of ecological communities (bdiversity) could occur due to the replacement of some species by others among communities (turnover), or differences in species richness, wherein the species in one community are a subset of the species in another community (nestedness), or the joint action of both (Baselga & Leprieur, 2015). Most of the heterogeneous environments exhibit higher taxonomic b-diversity than homogeneous environments (Bozelli et al, 2015;Soares et al, 2015), but it is uncertain how environmental homogenisation affects functional b-diversity (Ricotta & Burrascano, 2008;Swenson, 2011), which is based on the differences in functional traits of the species (Diaz & Cabido, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, while several studies have distinguished nestedness from turnover in studies of spatial beta diversity (e.g. Hortal et al, 2011;Leprieur et al, 2011;Svenning, Fløjgaard & Baselga, 2011), the temporal dynamics of these patterns have been evaluated less frequently (but see Angeler, 2013 andSoares et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Productivity is considered another major driver of beta diversity (Chase & Leibold, 2002;Chase & Ryberg, 2004;Chase, 2010), including for phytoplankton (Ptacnik et al, 2010), but the conclusions regarding its role are contradictory. Some authors suggest that species-sorting mechanisms prevail in environments with limited resources because high productivity should strengthen the role of stochasticity in assembling local communities (Chase, 2010;Bini et al, 2014;Soares et al, 2015). On the other hand, Langenheder et al (2012) suggest that species-sorting mechanisms are more common during highly productive periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current Environmental Impact Assessment techniques are insufficient to provide a real scenario about the fish fauna conservation status. A study to understand how the impact of all dams, with a method emphasizing all information for the entire watershed is needed, thus allowing to evaluate the impacts in multi scale can be performed using beta diversity (Soares et al 2015, Socolar et al 2015. Also, it is necessary to incorporate how the Land Use Change -LUC affects the watershed in a multi-scale approach as indicated by Leal et al (2016).…”
Section: Future Directions For Monitoring and Conservation Of The Fismentioning
confidence: 99%