2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.10.159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The linear and nonlinear optical response of CsGeX3 (X=Cl, Br, and I): The finite field and first-principles investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, in our measurements, CsPbBr 2 I shows 116%, 133%, and 275% higher d 33 than the CsPbBr 3 , CsPbI 3 , and CsbCl 3 , respectively. This measured d 33 of the CsPbBr 2 I is the highest among the scarcely reported family of piezoelectric cesium metal halide perovskites ( Figure a) [ 21,22,26,46–49 ] and the first of its kind of piezoelectric mixed‐halide type perovskites. The measured d 33 of the CsPbBr 3 in our method is 41 pC N −1 , which exhibits ≈98% similarity to the previously explored value of 40.3 pC N −1 by the PFM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Notably, in our measurements, CsPbBr 2 I shows 116%, 133%, and 275% higher d 33 than the CsPbBr 3 , CsPbI 3 , and CsbCl 3 , respectively. This measured d 33 of the CsPbBr 2 I is the highest among the scarcely reported family of piezoelectric cesium metal halide perovskites ( Figure a) [ 21,22,26,46–49 ] and the first of its kind of piezoelectric mixed‐halide type perovskites. The measured d 33 of the CsPbBr 3 in our method is 41 pC N −1 , which exhibits ≈98% similarity to the previously explored value of 40.3 pC N −1 by the PFM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Besides, some Cs-based nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals (not iodates) are also known and reported in the literature [13,15,18,25,35,39,51,63].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14] As another example, MASnI 3 thin films revealed a high d 33,eff of 20.8 pm V −1 with a well-developed butterfly loop. [15] Typically, the experimental piezoelectric coefficient ranged from 0.32 to 38 pm V −1 , [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] while the theoretical values were in the range of 4.1 to 31.4 pC N −1 , [11,12] which depended on halide composition (e.g., organic-inorganic versus inorganic compounds and B-site substitutions in ABX 3 structure) and the type of material (e.g., single-crystal, nanoparticle, and thin film) as summarized in Table S1 (Supporting Information).The enhanced piezoelectricity achieved by applying the in situ strain here was further verified by demonstrating the…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the variety of potential anisotropic halide compounds, piezoelectricity in perovskite halides has rarely been demonstrated experimentally, probably because of the difficulty of securing high-quality samples due to the limited availability of appropriate chemical precursors and synthesis methods. Table S1 (Supporting Information) summarizes the reported piezoelectric coefficients of halide materials, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] which were obtained from both experiments and theoretical simulations. Apart from the reported theoretical estimations of piezoelectricity, [11,12] the local piezoresponse as characterized by piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) is usually used to define the effective piezoelectric coefficient d 33,eff for synthesized halide materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation