2005
DOI: 10.1175/jcli3408.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Linear Response of ENSO to the Madden–Julian Oscillation

Abstract: The possibility that the tropical Pacific coupled system linearly amplifies perturbations produced by the Madden–Julian oscillation (MJO) is explored. This requires an estimate of the low-frequency tail of the MJO. Using 23 yr of NCEP–NCAR reanalyses of surface wind and Reynolds SST, we show that the spatial structure that dominates the intraseasonal band (i.e., the MJO) also dominates the low-frequency band once the anomalies directly related to ENSO have been removed. This low-frequency contribution of the i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
63
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…8) is mostly a linear response to the forcing, consistent with the point of view of Roulston and Neelin (2000), who showed that an intermediate complexity coupled model similar to CZ responded mainly to the slow component of stochastic noise forcing, and Zavala-Garay et al (2005), who used an intermediate complexity model and found that ENSO responds linearly to the lowfrequency power of the MJO. In the stochastic WWB case, however, the WWB energy is far less peaked in the interannual band, and the model appears to be responding nonlinearly to the forcing, rectifying fast WWB variability into slow ENSO amplitude.…”
Section: B Understanding the Different Response To Modulated And Stosupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8) is mostly a linear response to the forcing, consistent with the point of view of Roulston and Neelin (2000), who showed that an intermediate complexity coupled model similar to CZ responded mainly to the slow component of stochastic noise forcing, and Zavala-Garay et al (2005), who used an intermediate complexity model and found that ENSO responds linearly to the lowfrequency power of the MJO. In the stochastic WWB case, however, the WWB energy is far less peaked in the interannual band, and the model appears to be responding nonlinearly to the forcing, rectifying fast WWB variability into slow ENSO amplitude.…”
Section: B Understanding the Different Response To Modulated And Stosupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Note that the WWB events used here are meant to represent the episodic WWBs with a duration of a week or two in the observed record, rather than the intraseasonal scale wind perturbations such as those due to the Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) whose interactions with ENSO have been studied fairly extensively (e.g., Bergman et al 2001;Kessler 2001;Kessler et al 1995;Zavala-Garay et al 2005). The effects of the MJO on the CZ model were also studied by Zebiak (1989), who found that weak stochastic forcing with power mostly in the 20-60-day band had little effect on model simulations and hindcasts.…”
Section: B Parameterizing Wwb Modulation By Warm Pool Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this limits the discussion of linear response of the ocean to low-frequency MJO forcing [Zavala-Garay et al, 2005], it enables us to quantify the contribution of the nonlinear rectification of the intraseasonal MJO forcing. In a previous study, Jiang et al [2009] examined the rectification over 5 years and could not determine whether rectification of the MJO may have influence on ENSO.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily values of the SST were obtained by interpolation using a linear scheme as in Zavala-Garay et al (2005). The data domain of zonal wind was the whole equatorial strip of the Pacific Ocean from 120°E to 70°W and 15°N to 15°S, which contained most of the convective variability of the Pacific MJO; for SST, we concentrated on the tropical-subtropical Pacific Ocean (20°S to 20°N, 120°E to 70°W), which embodied most of the ENSO SST anomalies.…”
Section: The Data and Analysis Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When B is an eigenvector, the R and θ represent spatial features of propagating waves, whereas when B is a time series, they characterize the temporal evolution of the propagating waves. More information on HSVD can be found in Barnett (1983) and Zavala-Garay et al (2005).…”
Section: Hilbert Singular Value Decomposition (Hsvd)mentioning
confidence: 99%