2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The liquid–glass transition in sugars: Relaxation dynamics in trehalose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature dependence of relaxation times below the glass transition may follow the Arrhenius relationship, but changes above the glass transition become highly temperature-dependent and deviate from Arrhenian behavior which is used to classify materials to fragile and strong glass formers (Angell, 1993) The composition and water content of carbohydrate glass-formers has been found to affect their sub-T g and a-relaxations (Chan et al, 1986;Roos, 1995;Noel et al, 1996Noel et al, , 2000Champion et al, 2000;Le Meste et al, 2002;Psurek et al, 2004;Cummins et al, 2006;Kaminski et al, 2008a,b;Silalai and Roos, 2010b), but there is very little information on the miscibility and effects of composition on the relaxation behavior of mixtures of lowmolecular-weight carbohydrates and polymers. The objective of the present study was to determine effects of composition of milk solids at varying protein contents on their dielectric and mechanical a-relaxations as well as the temperature dependence of relaxation times around and above the glass transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature dependence of relaxation times below the glass transition may follow the Arrhenius relationship, but changes above the glass transition become highly temperature-dependent and deviate from Arrhenian behavior which is used to classify materials to fragile and strong glass formers (Angell, 1993) The composition and water content of carbohydrate glass-formers has been found to affect their sub-T g and a-relaxations (Chan et al, 1986;Roos, 1995;Noel et al, 1996Noel et al, , 2000Champion et al, 2000;Le Meste et al, 2002;Psurek et al, 2004;Cummins et al, 2006;Kaminski et al, 2008a,b;Silalai and Roos, 2010b), but there is very little information on the miscibility and effects of composition on the relaxation behavior of mixtures of lowmolecular-weight carbohydrates and polymers. The objective of the present study was to determine effects of composition of milk solids at varying protein contents on their dielectric and mechanical a-relaxations as well as the temperature dependence of relaxation times around and above the glass transition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass transition, or vitrification, is the process in which fluid practically solidifies without forming crystals. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of trehalose, for example, is high (115ºC) and as such it provides stability at relatively high supra-zero temperatures [52][53][54]. Trehalose is also unique in the fact that it does not completely lose its glass state even if it was slightly rehydrated.…”
Section: The Drying Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugar vitrification is a well‐established mechanism in anhydrobiosis for both plants and animals, which is generally associated with membrane and protein stabilization . Trehalose vitrifies at low water contents, but the capacity for protection is impacted by the glass transition temperature (Tg), which dictates the temperature and degree of hydration where the sugar will form or maintain a glassy state . Although the mechanism by which IDPs can reinforce and/or stabilize sugar glasses is not well understood, some LEA proteins and peptides have been shown to increase the Tg of sugar glasses .…”
Section: Disorder: Regulatory Element or Essential Property For Hydramentioning
confidence: 99%