2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgor.2004.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The load rebalancing problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is commonly agreed that reallocation imposes extra communication cost in the network, and so, it should be kept to a reasonable amount. For using reallocation to balance a single criterion, Aggrawal et al gave an O(N log N )-time algorithm for minimizing the maximum load in a set of homogeneous (identical) servers with the allowance to reallocate at most k objects [1]. The worst case ratio is bounded by 1.5, but the high time complexity makes it run as an offline algorithm.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly agreed that reallocation imposes extra communication cost in the network, and so, it should be kept to a reasonable amount. For using reallocation to balance a single criterion, Aggrawal et al gave an O(N log N )-time algorithm for minimizing the maximum load in a set of homogeneous (identical) servers with the allowance to reallocate at most k objects [1]. The worst case ratio is bounded by 1.5, but the high time complexity makes it run as an offline algorithm.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggarwal et al [15] first addressed the problem of makespan minimization with job migration. Given an assignment of a schedule, then migrate the jobs within a budget (at most k jobs) to minimize the makespan.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, in many systems, however, tasks cannot be fragmented, or if they can, there is a cost for fragmenting them. Previous algorithmic approaches for task scheduling across machines [4], [6]- [8], for provisioning server loads in [9], and for traffic engineering using interior gateway routing protocols [10] do not consider fragmentation costs in their models. The optimization approaches in [11]- [13] and the performance study in [14] also differ from our work in this same fundamental aspect.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%