2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00376-011-0233-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The local atmosphere and the turbulent heat transfer in the Eastern Himalayas

Abstract: To understand the local atmosphere and heat transfer and to facilitate the boundary-layer parameterization of numerical simulation and prediction, an observational campaign was conducted in the Eastern Himalayas in June 2010. The local atmospheric properties and near-surface turbulent heat transfers were analyzed. The local atmosphere in this region is warmer, more humid and less windy, with weaker solar radiation and surface radiate heating than in the Middle Himalayas. The near-surface turbulent heat transfe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that the total turbulent heat fluxes (defined as the sum of sensible and latent heat flux) over East, West, and Central Tibet were in the range of 80.0-144.0 Wm −2 , with a higher sensible heat transfer in the range of 43.0-86.0 Wm −2 , and a lower latent heat transfer with the range of 28.0-59.0 Wm −2 . However, Zou et al found that the near-surface heat transfer in the Southeast Tibet in early summer was significantly different from that in the other Tibetan regions [10], with a total heat flux of 86.3 Wm −2 , a sensible heat flux of 22.9 Wm −2 and a latent heat flux of 63.4 Wm −2 . The latent heat transfer dominates the land-air heat exchange in Southeast Tibet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that the total turbulent heat fluxes (defined as the sum of sensible and latent heat flux) over East, West, and Central Tibet were in the range of 80.0-144.0 Wm −2 , with a higher sensible heat transfer in the range of 43.0-86.0 Wm −2 , and a lower latent heat transfer with the range of 28.0-59.0 Wm −2 . However, Zou et al found that the near-surface heat transfer in the Southeast Tibet in early summer was significantly different from that in the other Tibetan regions [10], with a total heat flux of 86.3 Wm −2 , a sensible heat flux of 22.9 Wm −2 and a latent heat flux of 63.4 Wm −2 . The latent heat transfer dominates the land-air heat exchange in Southeast Tibet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results show the total turbulent heat transfer over the south, east, west, and central Tibet in a range of 80.0–144.0 W m −2 , with more sensible heat transfer in a range of 43.0–86.0 W m −2 and less latent heat transfer in a range of 28.0–59.0 W m −2 . However, as Zou et al [] measured the surface heat transfer in the Southeast Tibet in the same season, the land to air heat transfer was dominated by the latent heat transfer, different from the other Tibetan regions, with a total heat flux of 86.3 W m −2 , sensible heat flux of 22.9 W m −2 , latent heat flux of 63.4 W m −2 , and a Bowen ratio of 0.36.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tibetan atmosphere receives great amount of water vapor from the Bay of Bengal through the Yarlung Tsangpo water vapor pass in the Southeast Tibet [ Gao et al , ; Zhou et al , ]. The local atmosphere and the near‐surface energy exchange in the Southeast Tibet are distinct from the other Tibetan regions due to the impacts of the warm and wet flow of the South Asian summer monsoon [ Zou et al , ]. As the other Tibetan regions, the Southeast Tibet is characterized with steep topography and inhomogeneous land cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They showed the total turbulent heat fluxes from the surface to the air in the range of 80.0-144.0 W/m 2 , with more sensible heat transfer in the range of 43.0-86.0 W/m 2 and less latent heat transfer in the range of 28.0-59.0 W/m 2 . Zou et al (2012) measured the near-surface heat transfer in southeastern Tibet in early summer and found that the land-air heat transfer differed from the previous regions, with a total heat flux of 86.3 W/m 2 , a sensible heat flux of 22.9 W/m 2 , and a latent heat flux of 63.4 W/m 2 ; that is, latent heat transfer dominates the land-air heat exchange with a Bowen ratio of 0.36 in this region. These measurements exhibit a large variability in the land-air heat exchange from region to region across the Tibetan Plateau, with an 80 percent difference in total heat transfer, a 275 percent difference in sensible heat transfer, and a 125 percent difference in latent heat transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%