The location of emotional intelligence measured by EQ-i in the personality and cognitive space: Are there gender differences?

Abstract

IntroductionEmotional Intelligence (EI) is first described by Salovey and Mayer as the ability to perceive and understand emotions and the ability to use them as supports for thoughts. Despite the great notoriety of EI, its definition remains not completely clear. An operative definition of EI can be achieved by studying its connection with other individual characteristics such as gender, personality traits, and fluid intelligence.MethodsThe sample was composed of 1,063 Italian subjects. A total of 330 participants were employed (31.0%; 57.9% men) and 702 were university students (66.0%; 38.7% men). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), one of the most used questionnaires in literature, was used to measure EI. The exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) was used to assess the role of personality traits (five-factor model of personality) and fluid intelligence in EI. Statistical analyses on differences between men and women means of total and subscale EQ-i scores were estimated to evaluate whether EI, measured by EQ-i, is influenced by gender. Furthermore, a Multigroup Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted to assess measurement invariance in relation to gender groups.ResultsEmotional Intelligence, measured by EQ-i, is prevalently connected with personality traits rather than fluid intelligence. Furthermore, men outperformed women in the Intrapersonal and Stress Management EI factors, and women outperformed men in the Interpersonal EI factor. No difference in the means of the EI total score and EI latent general factor did not differ between gender groups.ConclusionEmotional Intelligence, measured by EQ-i, can be conceptually considered as a Trait EI. Furthermore, men are more capable to cope with negative events and to control impulses, while women are more able to distinguish, recognize, and comprehend others’ emotions.

The role of mentoring in developing leaders’ emotional intelligence: exploring mentoring types, emotional intelligence, organizational factors, and gender

“…Within the African context, data from Ethiopia draws a similar picture suggesting that female leaders scored higher in overall EI (Asmamaw and Semela, 2023). However, there is also neglected evidence showing that male participants scored higher, especially in the intrapersonal dimensions of EI (Perazzo et al, 2021;Tommasi et al, 2023). Our data provide information on leaders in the middle space offering a more detailed insight into educational leadership and gender distribution.…”

“…Contrary to common beliefs about gender-based roles, our data surprisingly showed that-for this sample-the socially established norms do not seem stable since male participants possessed higher levels of empathy than female participants when considering the occupational role (RQ5). Research predominantly acknowledges the notion that women are more emotionally intelligent, especially in the interpersonal dimensions of EI, such as empathy (Tommasi et al, 2023). Within the African context, data from Ethiopia draws a similar picture suggesting that female leaders scored higher in overall EI (Asmamaw and Semela, 2023).…”

A Response to “Concern About Returning to Face-to-Face Classes After the Pandemic: Importance of Emotional Intelligence and Stress Coping Strategies in Health Science Students” [Letter]

“… 1 It has been suggested that gender should be considered when interpreting EI scores; in particular the ability to perceive and understand others’ emotions, where women consistently achieve higher EI scores. 4 With women representing over three-quarters of the study sample, findings may reflect gender variance rather than true effects. Therefore, we suggest that the authors could have controlled for confounding factors or ensured greater gender balance.…”

Assessing the Professional Personality of College Counselors: A Student-Oriented Psychological Scale

“…Factor. This study selected scale data from the formal implementation test (N = 1171, see Table 4) and used LISREL 8.80 to develop a structural equation model for confirmatory factor analysis [54] of the factor structure of the five dimensions of college counselors' professional personality.…”