1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-2736(98)00126-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The location of fluorescence probes with charged groups in model membranes

Abstract: The location of commonly used charged fluorescent membrane probes in membranes was determined in order to: (1) investigate the relationship between the structure of hydrophobic molecules and their depth within membranes; and (2) aid interpretation of experiments in which these fluorescent probes are used to examine membrane structure. Membrane depth was calculated using parallax analysis, a method in which the quenching induced by lipids carrying a nitroxide group at different locations in the membrane is comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
74
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
8
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps for this reason, the two studies predict different transverse locations for the two fluorophores at equilibrium, with Texas Red in the upper acyl chain region and lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl in a more external position, near the water/lipid interface (co-localizing with the phosphate and choline groups of DPPC). This different behavior is not consistent with parallax analysis of experimental fluorescence quenching results, which predicts identical transverse locations of the two fluorophores in 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine vesicles (Kachel et al, 1998), despite TR being slightly more hydrophobic than lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl. The distinct behaviors of the two simulated probes therefore possibly stem from the differences in the model building procedure, which emphasizes the importance of careful parameterization of these polar fluorophores.…”
Section: Headgroup-labeled Phospholipid Probescontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Perhaps for this reason, the two studies predict different transverse locations for the two fluorophores at equilibrium, with Texas Red in the upper acyl chain region and lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl in a more external position, near the water/lipid interface (co-localizing with the phosphate and choline groups of DPPC). This different behavior is not consistent with parallax analysis of experimental fluorescence quenching results, which predicts identical transverse locations of the two fluorophores in 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine vesicles (Kachel et al, 1998), despite TR being slightly more hydrophobic than lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl. The distinct behaviors of the two simulated probes therefore possibly stem from the differences in the model building procedure, which emphasizes the importance of careful parameterization of these polar fluorophores.…”
Section: Headgroup-labeled Phospholipid Probescontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Fig. 1 represents the structures of these probes together with their suggested location and orientation with respect to the phospholipid bilayer as determined from previous studies (27) by the parallax method and comparison with other membrane probes (33). The probe F4N1 contains a small positively charged trimethylammonium group that can interact electrostatically with the lipid phosphate groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was applied successfully before (Chattopadhyay & London, 1987, Kachel et al, 1998, Kaiser & London, 1998.…”
Section: Position Of the Chromophore Of The Nxitc Dyementioning
confidence: 99%