2005
DOI: 10.1167/5.7.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The locus of fixation and the foveal cone mosaic

Abstract: High-resolution retinal imaging with adaptive optics was used to record the position of a light stimulus on the cone mosaic, with an error at least five times smaller than the diameter of the smallest foveal cones. We discuss the factors that limit the accuracy with which absolute retinal position can be determined. In five subjects, the standard deviation of fixation positions measured in discrete trials ranged from 2.1 to 6.3 arcmin, with an average of 3.4 arcmin (about 17 microm), in agreement with previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
149
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
21
149
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Cone density alone was found to be an insufficient parameter to determine the location of fixation. 22 Similarly, the impact of changes in binocular fixation characteristics due to improvement in vision in one eye in the eyes with bilateral NV-AMD was not accounted for in this study. 23 Further studies on autofluorescence and morphological characteristics of the macula may also provide insight into the determinants of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…21 Cone density alone was found to be an insufficient parameter to determine the location of fixation. 22 Similarly, the impact of changes in binocular fixation characteristics due to improvement in vision in one eye in the eyes with bilateral NV-AMD was not accounted for in this study. 23 Further studies on autofluorescence and morphological characteristics of the macula may also provide insight into the determinants of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To control the retinal location imaged, subjects were instructed to fixate on particular intersections of black radial lines and concentric circles on a white background. Between seven and 30 images were collected for each condition described below, registered with subpixel accuracy (Putnam et al, 2005), and added together. To minimize the deleterious effects of fluctuations in cone reflectivity over time (Pallikaris et al, 2003), the different imaging conditions were interleaved over a period of 1-3 d.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was some success in imaging the smallest photoreceptors, the cones at the foveal center and the rods (which are comparable in size and morphology) using flood illuminated adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy, 11,12 these cells remained unresolved in adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) until only recently (Dubra et al, in preparation). Foveal cones are particularly interesting to study because along with the optical quality of the eye, it is these cells that underlie visual acuity.…”
Section: Photoreceptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%