2000
DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.6.826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The logic of interpreting evidence of developmental ordering: Strong inference and categorical measures.

Abstract: Developmental ordering is a fundamental prediction of developmental theories and a central issue in developmental research. However, logically sound evidence of developmental ordering is difficult to obtain. This article analyzes the logical basis of testing developmental order hypotheses with categorical measures. Depending on whether saltatory (i.e., discrete) or continuous developmental changes are being assessed, the observed relationship between categorical measures yields very different types of informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is true, future studies that employ longitudinal methods will continue to find that measures of shyness taken at earlier developmental time periods will predict future emotion-processing skills, but that the reverse will not be true}emotion-processing skills will not predict changes in shyness. Therefore, the present results are consistent with a unidirectional rather than a bi-directional longitudinal relationship between these variables (Dixon & Moore, 2000). The results of the present study are mixed with respect to the idea that shyness involves an information processing deficit that is emotion-specific.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this is true, future studies that employ longitudinal methods will continue to find that measures of shyness taken at earlier developmental time periods will predict future emotion-processing skills, but that the reverse will not be true}emotion-processing skills will not predict changes in shyness. Therefore, the present results are consistent with a unidirectional rather than a bi-directional longitudinal relationship between these variables (Dixon & Moore, 2000). The results of the present study are mixed with respect to the idea that shyness involves an information processing deficit that is emotion-specific.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Of course, a longitudinal correlational investigation is incapable of proving causality. Nevertheless, a failure to observe longitudinal predictive relationships counts as evidence against the existence of a causal relationship (Dixon & Moore, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that being able to infer an individual's stereotype precedes awareness of broadly held stereotypes. If this were true, all children aware of broadly held stereotypes would be able to infer an individual's stereotype (Dixon & Moore, 2000). To test this hypothesis, we cross-tabulated the ability to infer an individual's stereotype with awareness of broadly held stereotypes.…”
Section: Stereotype Consciousness Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, I argue that the field has been unable to capitalize on one of its most fundamental types of evidence, developmental order, because tests of developmental order have not been available unless one is willing to take the position that development is saltatory (or that one's continuous measures are interval scales). It is worth noting that if development is continuous, but a researcher's measures are discrete, interpreting developmental ordering patterns becomes problematic (see Dixon & Moore, 2000, for a discussion). Therefore, converting one's continuous measures into categorical measures, or collecting categorical measures of continuously developing variables, hides the problem but does not solve it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%