The Logic of Justification

Artëmov, Sergei

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_32

Cited by 14 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors are grateful to the Economic and Social Research Council and the Cambridge Humanities Research Grant for financial support and to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Connectionism; Von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944); I Ajzen (1985); Olson (1965); Ostrom (1997); Coase (1937); Mazur (1987); Thaler and Sunstein (2008); Knight (1921); Deci and Ryan (1985); Zadeh (1965); Hamilton (1964); Pavlov (1927); Kahneman and Tversky (1979); Rosenstock (1966); Kauffman (1993); Marshall (1890); Simon (1982); E. Rogers (1962); Latour (2005); Skinner (1938); Festinger (1957); Watson (1913); J. Smith and Price (1973); Bandura (1986); Jensen and Meckling (1976); Markowitz (1952); Carpenter and Grossberg (1987); Freeman (1984); Tanner and Swets (1954); R. Rogers (1975); Ostrom (1990); A. Smith (1759); Bandura (1977); Gonzalez, Lerch, and Lebiere (2003); Edwards (1961); Putnam (1993); Venkatesh and Davis (2000); Bernoulli (1954); Arrow (1951);Oliver (1980); Liberman and Trope (1998); Von…”

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review

Kwon

Silva

2019

Journal of Planning Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The term "behavioral" has become a hot topic in recent years in various disciplines; however, there is yet limited understanding of what theories can be considered behavioral theories and what fields of research they can be applied to. Through a crossdisciplinary literature review, this article identifies sixty-two behavioral theories from 963 search results, mapping them in a diagram of four groups (factors, strategies, learning and conditioning, and modeling), and points to five discussion points: understanding of terms, classification, guidance on the use of appropriate theories, inclusion in data-driven research and agentbased modeling, and dialogue between theory-driven and data-driven approaches.

show abstract

Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review

Kwon

Silva

2019

Journal of Planning Literature

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This question overlaps with a long and intense debate in the agricultural development literature on preferences for top-down and bottom-up governance for the introduction of new practices. Preferences for top-down practices are inherent in Hardin's (1968) "tragedy of commons" argument that pointed to the tendency towards over-consumption of common resources and Olson's (1965) concerns over free-riding of public goods. Top-down and more centralized implementation of new practices is argued to work best if there are benefits from economies of scale, require high levels of central coordination and where preferences and needs are likely to be more homogenous (Mansuri and Rao, 2013).…”

Section: Network Governance: Hierarchies Central Actors and Bottom-umentioning

confidence: 99%

The role of social networks in the inclusion of small-scale producers in agri-food developing clusters

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper discusses how network theory and social capital can help explain different patterns of inclusion of small and medium sized producers in agri-food clusters. We make the argument that despite the centralized nature of practices, the manner in which inclusion takes place can vary significantly depending on structural features of local networks and governance factors, especially social capital and the role of lead organisations. Social network analysis allows us to investigate how different patterns of bonding, bridging and centrality of key actors in agricultural clusters can influence diffusion of knowledge. We frame this discussion through a typology that allows us to identify diverse scenarios of inclusion of small producers. This is then used to guide an empirical analysis of two agri-food clusters of small producers in Peru (mango) and Colombia (palm oil). Judicious use of mixed methods and the typology can prove useful to explain diverse patterns of inclusion which have important implications for small-scale agricultural producers.

show abstract

“…As an immaculate bandmaster, nature has designed seamless ways to ensure cooperative-competition among different species. However, unlike the notion of collective action in human societies [1], individual cost-benefits in the natural schema are conjoined with that of the whole. The splice ensures no free lunch and preempts a proprietary claim to the ecosystem services by any species.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biodiversity clock and conservation triangle: Integrative platform for biodiversity monitoring, evaluation, and preemptive conservation intervention

Jaishanker

Vishnu

Rajan

et al. 2019

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

25Business-as-usual is no more an option on the table for biodiversity conservation. Disruptive 26 transformation at both policy and polity levels are pressing needs. The possibilities presented by 27 the current wave of information and communication technology can act as travelators to meet the 28 conservation targets. Here, we introduce twin concepts of biodiversity clock and conservation 29 triangle that posit as convergence plane to seamlessly consolidate ongoing discrete efforts and 30 convey real-time biodiversity information in a lucid schematic form. In its present form, the 31 biodiversity clock depicts 12 ecological and 6 biophysical components. The universal 32 consistency in clock-reading facilitates the biodiversity clock to be read and interpreted 33 identically across the world. A ternary plot of the International Union of Conservation of Nature 34 (IUCN) species conservation status is presented as the conservation triangle. Together, the 35 biodiversity clock and the conservation triangle are invaluable in strategizing biodiversity 36 conservation, post-2020. Leveraged smartly, they make possible pre-emptive intervention for 37 biodiversity conservation. 38 Introduction 40 Biological diversity is a strategic investment made by nature that ensures perpetual competition 41 and progressive improvement of life forms. Individual species, like entrepreneurs, scout for 42 opportunities (niches) within and beyond their native habitats. Successful entrepreneurs acquire 43 more niches, gain a competitive edge, and become keystone assets. The synchronized orchestra 44 of different life forms generates value-added (ecosystem) services. As an immaculate 45 bandmaster, nature has designed seamless ways to ensure cooperative-competition among 3 46 different species. However, unlike the notion of collective action in human societies [1], 47individual cost-benefits in the natural schema are conjoined with that of the whole. The splice 48 ensures no free lunch and preempts a proprietary claim to the ecosystem services by any species. 49All species have to contribute in order to enjoy the benefits of value-added services. The system 50 satiates both the micro and macro contributors. While the former gets a habitat, the status of the 51 latter (keystones) is imaginary, sans the former. 52The total productivity of an ecosystem is linked to the individual productivity of all constituent 53 species and is governed by the limiting factor resource [2]. Nature has designed the system in 54 such a way as to predominantly expend the value-added services, in-situ. The design of activities 55 (biotic-biotic, biotic-abiotic and abiotic-abiotic interactions) and the spatio-temporal distribution 56 of resources within (eco) systems, help to generate unique services. Within a stable structural 57 ensemble, ecosystems remain sustainable and productive. Here too, the ingenuity of the 58 bandmaster is on display. Albeit stable, structural ensembles are not rigid. They are amenable to 59 gradual changes, which in-turn coerce the vying...

show abstract

The Logic of Justification

Cited by 14 publications

References 30 publications

Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review

Mapping the Landscape of Behavioral Theories: Systematic Literature Review

The role of social networks in the inclusion of small-scale producers in agri-food developing clusters

Biodiversity clock and conservation triangle: Integrative platform for biodiversity monitoring, evaluation, and preemptive conservation intervention

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About