2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0257-8972(02)00212-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The long-range effect in ion implanted metallic materials: dislocation structures, properties, stresses, mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
43
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
43
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments performed for Cu, Mo, Pt and α-Fe have shown the change of material properties far beyond the ion range, simulated e.g. using SRIM code [7,8]. This phenomena is called "long range effect" (LRE) because, as reported by some of the authors a change in the dislocation structure occurs at distances of tens of µm even when the predicted ion range was only a few hundred nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The experiments performed for Cu, Mo, Pt and α-Fe have shown the change of material properties far beyond the ion range, simulated e.g. using SRIM code [7,8]. This phenomena is called "long range effect" (LRE) because, as reported by some of the authors a change in the dislocation structure occurs at distances of tens of µm even when the predicted ion range was only a few hundred nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…36,37 This increase in stress may be partly due to gallium implantation during the fabrication of the micropillars with the Ga + ion beam. [38][39][40] Depending on the accelerating voltage, Ga + ions can be found 10-20 nm from the surface at low voltages 38 and up to 1000 nm at high voltages. 40 Another possibility for the high twinning stress is a size effect for twinning induced plasticity similar to the dislocation nucleation controlled size effect encountered in micropillar studies of fcc metals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the effect has been detected only during microhardness measurements. Although it has been presented in several papers [1][2][3], its range is questionable due to the difficulty in determining the thickness of the layer with increased hardness by measurements performed with the use of a microhardness tester. A modified layer is penetrated by the indenter, which can be laterally supported by the layer; this leads to overestimation of the thickness of the layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the depth of the hardness tester indenter cannot exceed 1/10 of the thickness of the measured layer [4]. It has to be mentioned that the authors of papers [2,3] used a Vickers pyramid penetrating a depth of 1-5 µm at 15-20 g loads. The aim of the present study is to determine the thickness of a layer with improved tribological properties by measurements of the friction coefficient and wear of Ti6Al4V alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation