1994
DOI: 10.1086/117081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The luminosity function for different morphological types in the CfA Redshift Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
235
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
30
235
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the parameters of the LF, we use the STY method (Sandage et al 1979;Loveday et al 1992;Marzke et al 1994Marzke et al , 1998Efstathiou, Ellis, & Peterson 1988;Willmer 1997), assuming that the LF is described by the Schechter form (Schechter 1976),…”
Section: Sty Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To estimate the parameters of the LF, we use the STY method (Sandage et al 1979;Loveday et al 1992;Marzke et al 1994Marzke et al , 1998Efstathiou, Ellis, & Peterson 1988;Willmer 1997), assuming that the LF is described by the Schechter form (Schechter 1976),…”
Section: Sty Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we do not have a reliable scheme to distinguish E's from S0's quantitatively, we instead divide the sample above and below M B < À20. According to the LFs of local field E/S0's (Marzke et al 1994) and cluster E/S0's (e.g., Dressler 1980), E's are more abundant than S0's at M B d À 20, while S0's are more abundant than E's at M B e À 20. Figures 19 and 20 show the ellipticity distribution of Groth Strip QS-E/S0's divided this way.…”
Section: Ellipticity Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ∆'s indicate the assumed intrinsic dispersions of the M BH -σ⋆ or M BH -L bul relations. (b) Local BHMF for early type galaxies derived using the luminosity functions from different surveys (Bernardi et al 2003b;Marzke et al 1994;Kochanek et al 2001;Nakamura et al 2003) and the M BH -L bul relation with ∆(M BH )=0.3. The shaded area and errorbars have the same meaning as in (a).…”
Section: Consistency Of the Mbh-σ⋆ And Mbh-l Bul Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the parameters θ * , M 0 and γ where calculated for the different morphological types, using the luminosity distribution functions by [38]. The parameter ǫ = 0.8 ± 0.1 depends on the slopes of the adopted M bh − σ 1D and L − σ 1D relations.…”
Section: The Expected Number Of Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%