2019
DOI: 10.31195/ejejfs.535803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The macro and micro nutrition status of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in Inegol (Bursa-Turkey)

Abstract: Chestnut is a plant that is grown in limited areas in the world and is profitable for its producer. In spite of this, the determination of nutrient elements and fertilization studies in chestnut orchards are insufficient. This study was carried out to determine the mineral nutritional status of Anatolian chestnuts cultivated in Inegol (Bursa) by soil and leaf analysis. In this research, the soil samples were taken from 25 different chestnut orchards (5 locations) in Inegol district only in April 2012. The ches… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the yellowing leaves showed lower Fe and Mn and higher Ca and Mg contents than the healthy ones. In detail, Mn content in both theses is decidedly lower than the values reported in the literature as adequate (Toprak & Seferoglu 2013, Arrobas et al 2018, Toprak 2019. Chestnut grows preferentially on acidic soil and, for this reason, a Mn deficit is rarely reported, while antagonism or toxicity phenomena are highlighted (Portela et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In our study, the yellowing leaves showed lower Fe and Mn and higher Ca and Mg contents than the healthy ones. In detail, Mn content in both theses is decidedly lower than the values reported in the literature as adequate (Toprak & Seferoglu 2013, Arrobas et al 2018, Toprak 2019. Chestnut grows preferentially on acidic soil and, for this reason, a Mn deficit is rarely reported, while antagonism or toxicity phenomena are highlighted (Portela et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%