2018
DOI: 10.11611/yead.420440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Macroeconomic Effects of Sovereign Risk Premium Shock: A Case Study for Turkey

Abstract: The macroeconomic effects of sovereign risk premium shocks in Turkey are investigated by employing Structural Vector Autoregression Model for the period 2005:12-2017:3. The model includes emerging market bond index plus Turkey (EMBI + TR) as an indicator of sovereign risk premium for Turkey. The empirical results of our analysis indicate that structural shocks in sovereign risk premium affect macroeconomic variables negatively in Turkey. One standard deviation shock in EMBI+TR results in devaluation of Turkish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Longstaff et al (2011:76) Turkey is in a high sovereign CDS spread position because of the macroeconomic instability during the past few years. Several attempts have been made to highlight the drivers of sovereign CDS spreads for Turkey (Kilci, 2017;Gebeşoğlu and Varlık, 2018;Şahin, 2018;Polat, 2017). In a recent study, Cihangir (2020) investigates the global and domestic variables that affect Turkey's sovereign CDS spreads between the 2009 and 2018 periods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Longstaff et al (2011:76) Turkey is in a high sovereign CDS spread position because of the macroeconomic instability during the past few years. Several attempts have been made to highlight the drivers of sovereign CDS spreads for Turkey (Kilci, 2017;Gebeşoğlu and Varlık, 2018;Şahin, 2018;Polat, 2017). In a recent study, Cihangir (2020) investigates the global and domestic variables that affect Turkey's sovereign CDS spreads between the 2009 and 2018 periods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%