The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of tax changes on economic activity. We use the narrative record, such as presidential speeches and Congressional reports, to identify the size, timing, and principal motivation for all major postwar tax policy actions. This analysis allows us to separate legislated changes into those taken for reasons related to prospective economic conditions and those taken for more exogenous reasons. The behavior of output following these more exogenous changes indicates that tax increases are highly contractionary. The effects are strongly significant, highly robust, and much larger than those obtained using broader measures of tax changes. (JEL E32, E62, H20, N12)

How Does Fiscal Policy Affect GDP and Inflation in Ukraine?

“…Mertens and Ravn (2013) estimate the impact of individual income taxes (PIT and social contributions) and CIT on a number of macroeconomic variables. They develop a method of estimation (proxy SVAR), which combines the best properties of the Blanchard-Perotti approach and the narrative approach proposed by Romer and Romer (2010). The results indicate that taxes on individual income are more effective in stimulating employment and private consumption than CIT.…”

Infrastructure Spending as Fiscal Stimulus: Assessing the Evidence

“…These restrictions are then imposed in dynamic, multiple-equations models (VARs) to identify exogenous movements in taxes empirically. As in Romer and Romer (2010), they find a large multiplier that peaks at 5, five years after the tax increase.…”

“…For instance, Romer and Romer (2010) examine the reasons behind changes in U.S. federal tax rates identifying those related to boosting long-term growth or to reducing an inherited budget deficit as exogenous to current economic conditions. Regressing real GDP growth on this measure of (arguably) exogenous tax changes, they find a large peak multiplier of 3 (meaning that a $1 tax cut increases real GDP by $3).…”

Austerity policies, economic growth and fiscal balance: lessons from Slovenia

“…There is a number of empirical studies investigating austerity policies (Giavazzi and Pagano, 1990;Blanchard and Perotti, 2002;Ardagna, 1998, 2010;Romer and Romer, 2010;Matsaganis and Leventi, 2014). The expansionary fiscal adjustment hypothesis is typically used to argue in favour of austerity policy measures (Giavazzi and Pagano, 1990).…”