The Making of the Internet

Schönberger, Klaus

doi:10.1007/978-3-322-87318-7_4

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its task is not to predict the future but to enlighten the present.' 108 At the same time the US federal system and the European multilevel architecture share an important structural analogy: they both feature a pluralist, heterarchical constitutional arrangement for the protection of fundamental rights, with rights being simultaneously recognized at the state and federal/supranational levels and adjudicated by a plurality of institutions operating in these multiple layers. 109 Hence, assessing in a comparative perspective how the issue of voting rights for non-citizens has historically been dealt with in the US constitutional system raises useful insights to understand the current European challenges and provides some cautionary tales to appreciate the possible scenarios that might open up in the future in the European multilevel human rights system.…”

Section: Electoral Rights For Non-citizens In the European Multilevelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voting Rights for Non-Citizens: The European Multilevel and the US Federal Constitutional Systems Compared

Fabbrini¹

2011

European Constitutional Law Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Voting rights – Citizens and aliens – European multilevel architecture – US federal system – Comparative methodology – Different regulatory models for non-citizens suffrage at the state level in Europe – Impact of supranational law – Challenges and tensions – Analogous dynamics in the US constitutional experience – Recent European legal and jurisprudential developments in comparative perspective – What future prospects for citizenship and democracy in Europe?

show abstract

Section: Electoral Rights For Non-citizens In the European Multilevelmentioning

confidence: 99%