The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9867-3_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Market Alternative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some rural areas of the West have passed regulation to reduce the transferability of water rights due, mainly, to concerns related to the long-term economic health of source regions of water trades and fears that the loss of agricultural productivity will lead to increased levels of unemployment and other social issues [66]. Popular accounts of local resistance to water transfers [7,67] generally depict such transactions negatively-particularly as related to the perceived loss of long-term economic viability in the source region and to market inequalities; some suggest that such inequities doom the viability of water markets as a solution to the water allocation dilemmas facing western states [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some rural areas of the West have passed regulation to reduce the transferability of water rights due, mainly, to concerns related to the long-term economic health of source regions of water trades and fears that the loss of agricultural productivity will lead to increased levels of unemployment and other social issues [66]. Popular accounts of local resistance to water transfers [7,67] generally depict such transactions negatively-particularly as related to the perceived loss of long-term economic viability in the source region and to market inequalities; some suggest that such inequities doom the viability of water markets as a solution to the water allocation dilemmas facing western states [68].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allocation is increasingly subject to ownership rules and market mechanisms. Even so, privatization has not always been successful (Dellapenna 2009 for the United States, Schouten and Schwartz 2006;Tecco 2008 for the developing countries). In the developing world, allocation rules are highly contested, not only because of the concentration of water ownership, but because distribution networks are poorly organized and the ability of the poor to pay for diverse water uses is limited.…”
Section: Water Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most scholars considered the promotion of water rights trading a forced step in the U.S., so as to escape the strictness and the inefficient outcomes of riparian doctrine and prior appropriation principle [29,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Market-driven solutions are meant to introduce the flexibility needed in the management of water [28,29] to guarantee efficient allocation and exploitation of water resources.…”
Section: Undecided Property Model and Water Rights Doctrines In Commomentioning
confidence: 99%