2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1199(02)00046-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The market for corporate control in a bank-based economy: a governance device?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, one can conclude that there is no active market for corporate control in Germany. This conclusion is supported by Franks and Mayer (1990) and Köke (2004), although Jenkinson and Ljunqvist (2001) show that there exists a market for partial control stakes which is frequently hostile (see next section).…”
Section: Managerial Remunerationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, one can conclude that there is no active market for corporate control in Germany. This conclusion is supported by Franks and Mayer (1990) and Köke (2004), although Jenkinson and Ljunqvist (2001) show that there exists a market for partial control stakes which is frequently hostile (see next section).…”
Section: Managerial Remunerationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Control concentration is also very high when measured by using an ultimate control criterion which tracks control throughout chains of direct stakes Schmid 2000a, 2000b) and by the Cubbin and Leech (1983) index (as applied by Köke (2001)). Ultimate control concentration is even higher in unlisted firms (see also Edwards and Nibler (2000) and Köke (2004)). 6 Becht and Boehmer (2001,2003) show that not only is there a high concentration of voting power in listed companies (82% of them have a large blockholder controlling ultimately more than 25% of the voting rights), but the largest shareholder often does not face other large shareholders (only 20% of these companies have more than two registered blockholders) and the average size of the second largest block (7.4%) is small (see also Edwards and Fischer (1994) and Edwards and Nibler (2000)).…”
Section: [Insert Table 1 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They separate ownership from control by using chains of successive participations starting at the top by an ultimate shareholder (Renneboog, 2000;ECGN, 2001, Köke 2004). Because of the embedded structure of pyramids, the direct voting rights which ignore leverages underestimate the control power of some dominant shareholders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%