1996
DOI: 10.1515/ijmr-1996-870105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Martensitic Structure and Shape Memory Effect in NiMn Alloyed by Ti and Al

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Adachi and Wayman 231 concluded that Ti, Al, Cu or B additions did not improve ductility, results from later studies contradicted this finding. Instead, Potapov et al 233 reported that elongation to failure in compression at room temperature increased from less than 2% strain in Ni 50?2 Mn 49?8 to above 10% for a Ni 40?3 Mn 50?1 Ti 9?6 (at-%) alloy and over 15% strain in Ni 39?7 Mn 50?3 Al 10 . Ductility in bending was worse than in compression in all cases, but up to 10% strain in bending was still possible without cracking in Ni 39?7 Mn 50?3 Al 10 .…”
Section: Iii1?4 Co Based Non-thermoelastic Htsmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although Adachi and Wayman 231 concluded that Ti, Al, Cu or B additions did not improve ductility, results from later studies contradicted this finding. Instead, Potapov et al 233 reported that elongation to failure in compression at room temperature increased from less than 2% strain in Ni 50?2 Mn 49?8 to above 10% for a Ni 40?3 Mn 50?1 Ti 9?6 (at-%) alloy and over 15% strain in Ni 39?7 Mn 50?3 Al 10 . Ductility in bending was worse than in compression in all cases, but up to 10% strain in bending was still possible without cracking in Ni 39?7 Mn 50?3 Al 10 .…”
Section: Iii1?4 Co Based Non-thermoelastic Htsmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ductility in bending was worse than in compression in all cases, but up to 10% strain in bending was still possible without cracking in Ni 39?7 Mn 50?3 Al 10 . 233 The improvements due to Ti addition were argued to be caused by a decrease in grain size, and improvements from Al addition to be a result of the formation of the ductile c phase. Replacement of Ni by Al, Ti, Cu or Fe reduces transformation temperatures more than replacement of Ni by Mn in identical amounts.…”
Section: Iii1?4 Co Based Non-thermoelastic Htsmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 80 As previously mentioned, in Heusler alloys, substitution is understood in terms of the number of valence electrons, where going way from the e/a of MnNi (8.5) lowers the transition temperature. 17 In the case of Ni 2 Mn 1– x Ti x , there is effectively an isostructural substitution of the NiMn alloy that has a high T M of 973 K 84 toward an austenite ground state since the higher Ti content lowers T M until the transition vanishes. At the same time, Co is added to manipulate the magnetic ground state and thus the CTW.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some serious problems still remain unsolved in this system, namely polycrystalline brittleness and poor shape memory effects (SMEs). In order to overcome these problems, several attempts by alloying have been made, such as Ni-Mn-Ti and Ni-Mn-Al ternary alloys [5][6][7]. Additionally, two-phase microstructure of β(B2) + γ is obtained by alloying, which is beneficial for the ductility improvement of Ni-Mn SMAs [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%