2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mass-loss return from evolved stars to the Large Magellanic Cloud

Abstract: We present a radiative transfer model for the circumstellar dust shell around a Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) long-period variable (LPV) previously studied as part of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) survey of the LMC. OGLE LMC LPV 28579 (SAGE J051306.40-690946.3) is a carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star for which we have Spitzer broadband photometry and spectra from the SAGE and SAGE-Spec programs along with broadband UBVIJHK s photometry. By modeling this source, we obtain a base… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(137 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the O-rich stars HV 5715 and sagemcj052206, Sargent et al (2010) fitted the SED and IRS spectra, and their results agree well with the GRAMS-based results of Sargent et al (2011) and Riebel et al (2012) (see Table 3). The fitting method of Jones et al (2012), however, led to a much higher estimate of dust MLRs.…”
Section: Jones Et Al (2012)supporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the O-rich stars HV 5715 and sagemcj052206, Sargent et al (2010) fitted the SED and IRS spectra, and their results agree well with the GRAMS-based results of Sargent et al (2011) and Riebel et al (2012) (see Table 3). The fitting method of Jones et al (2012), however, led to a much higher estimate of dust MLRs.…”
Section: Jones Et Al (2012)supporting
confidence: 75%
“…They also accounted for inclination angle of the LMC disk which leads to some differences in luminosity and MLR (Jones et al, 2012, private communication Srinivasan et al (2010) 4810, 6580 2.5 (2.4-2.9) Srinivasan et al (2011) 6170 2. 4 Riebel et al (2012) 7080 ± 700 2.12 ± 0.42 present paper 4740 3.2 HV 5715 Sargent et al (2010) 36 000 ± 4000 2.3 (1.1-4.1) Sargent et al (2011) 33 000 1.5 Riebel et al (2012) 33 700 ± 5960 1.56 ± 0.43 Jones et al (2012) 28 800 19.6 Jones et al (2014) 19 230 ± 4300 0.63 ± 0.14 present work 28 200 0.25 sagemcj052206 Sargent et al (2010) 5100 ± 500 2.0 (1.1-3.1) Sargent et al (2011) Ossenkopf et al (1992) for single-sized grains of 0.15 µm and compared those to the grains that best fit HV 5715 and sagemcj052206 in the present work. The grains in the present work are larger, and the ratio of opacities at 1 and 2 µm are 1.5-2.6 and 2-6, respectively, consistent with the differences in MLRs between the present work and most of the works based on the M-star GRAMS grid.…”
Section: Jones Et Al (2014)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are typical values for a carbonaceous dusty outflow (for e.g. Srinivasan et al 2010;Hony et al 2002). By fitting the SED and comparing the result with the scattered light images, we can constrain the albedo and density structure of the grains.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A more precise estimate for the injection rate requires detailed radiative transfer (RT) modeling of the spectral energy distribution (SED) of each star in the candidate list. Many authors have computed such detailed models for LMC carbon stars (see, e.g., van Loon et al 1999;Groenewegen et al 2009;Srinivasan et al 2010). The computation of individual models becomes time-consuming for large samples such as the SAGE dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We circumvent this assumption by adopting a more general treatment -we specify the inner radius as input to the modeling and this automatically determines the temperature of the dust in the shell when the model is computed. The output SEDs are very sensitive to the inner radius R in (see, e.g., Srinivasan et al 2010) and we incorporate this dependence in our grid by computing models for different R in values. We thus provide a large grid of models that is complementary to the currently available grids constructed by other authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%