The material geographies of advertising: Concrete objects, affective affordance and urban space

Abstract

This paper contributes to an expanding concern with the urban geographies of advertising. The paper outlines the need to investigate the difference the material logics of advertising technology (hardware, software and code) make to the bodies and spaces of urban life. Through an intensified capacity to selectively open up to and interact with urban space, I argue, technological advancements in outdoor advertising launch the advertising object into a more compatible relation with urban space. I exemplify this by pulling out and detailing the recent development of image-recognition technology, anti-hacking features and thermal management systems, each of which are becoming central to the contemporary material conditions of outdoor advertising. Through the lens of Gilbert Simondon's notion of ‘concretisation', these technological advancements are conceptualised as resolving particular commercial incompatibilities in the relation between advertising object and excessive environments. Taken together, they leverage the outdoor advertising object’s control over its capacities to affect and be affected, that is, over its affective affordance. I suggest this has significant implications for how we engage and intervene into the politics of advertising geographies.

Chaos in Motion: Measuring Visual Pollution with Tangential View Landscape Metrics

“…The former use chaos as a form of communication [94]. The latter quantifies the landscape to propose sustainable solutions against spatial chaos [5,11,23] However, spatial chaos should not be confused with spatial uniformity [95]. As mentioned, the attribution of positive or negative qualities to spatial chaos depends on the personal aesthetics and education of the observer, and may be further influenced by experiencing the landscapes of branded-cities [96] in everyday life.…”

Dismantling the advertising city: Subvertising and the urban commons to come

“…Subvertisers develop an unusual spatial knowledge of the material manifestation of this obsession, turning them, perhaps ironically, into a collective body paying more attention to advertising than anyone else. To follow them around town is to bear witness to peculiar material constructs: spikey anti-climbing cages enclose ladders towering up to billboards; vandal-proof glass fortifies bus shelter adverts against spray paint, bricks, baseball bats, out-of-control cars and any other destructive (non)human forces (Iveson, 2012); key locks prevent simple removal of posters; billboard CCTV cameras trace any possibly illicit gesture for later use in court rooms; automated mixtures of anti-hacking coding, software and hardware keep unauthorised texts and images from being displayed on digital billboards (Dekeyser, 2018).…”

Gilbert Simondon and the Technical Mentalities and Transindividual Affects of Art-science

“…3 Simondon argued that this can be seen in the growing intrusion of psycho-social and cultural factors (fashion, decoration) into technical concretizations, and the unrelenting rhythms of capitalist innovation and consumption, which serve to intensify the obsolescence of technologies: ‘a car deteriorates quickly because it was made to be seen rather than used’ (Simondon, 2012a: 11). Another pernicious implication of this pursuit of commercial interests has been the closure of technical objects through various legal, institutional and technical mechanisms (such as patents, warranties and forms of anti-tampering features or software) that attempt to place constraints on what technical apparatuses can do and become (Dekeyser, 2018). These artificial limits serve to encourage an ignorance in both thought and practice of the material realities of technical individuation.…”