2004
DOI: 10.1177/1524839903258885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Matrix Method of Literature Reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used the ‘matrix method’ to abstract data from the retrieved studies (Goldman & Schmalz, 2004). As described by Goldman and Schmalz (2004), ‘the matrix method is a structure and process for systematically reviewing the literature and a system for bringing order’ to the resulting data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we used the ‘matrix method’ to abstract data from the retrieved studies (Goldman & Schmalz, 2004). As described by Goldman and Schmalz (2004), ‘the matrix method is a structure and process for systematically reviewing the literature and a system for bringing order’ to the resulting data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Goldman and Schmalz (2004), ‘the matrix method is a structure and process for systematically reviewing the literature and a system for bringing order’ to the resulting data. For the eight descriptive studies, our analyses consisted of summarizing data regarding corner store inventories, including food and beverage availability, quality, and shelf space, as well as sales.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A debatable consensus of literature review notion, so-called information synthesis (Goldschmidt, 1986) and the vast dynamics of knowledge, including language (Dakhi, 2011), stimulate the scholar's effort to define and divide it. It is simply grouped into traditional (Booth, Sutton, & Papaioannou, 2012) and systematic approach-based definitions (Cronin, Ryan, & Coughlan, 2007). Criticism, summary, and inference are credited to the traditional process, an opposite to the systematic one as a selected relevant study procedurally applying identification, comprehension, application, analysis, and synthesis.…”
Section: Redefining Information Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criticism, summary, and inference are credited to the traditional process, an opposite to the systematic one as a selected relevant study procedurally applying identification, comprehension, application, analysis, and synthesis. More technically, a traditional definition or a non-systematic review, a basis of scholarly material, is poorly conducted and reported (Booth, Sutton, & Papaioannou, 2012). Constructing the topic, the selection of methods, and demonstration that the research contributes something new (Webster & Watson, 2002), not merely an elaborated bibliography of multiple research manuscripts, are what writer(s) do.…”
Section: Redefining Information Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their article titled "The Matrix Method of Literature Reviews" by Goldman and Schmalz (2004), a stepwise advice is offered about the entire Literature Review process including the actual 'review' that requires the analysis, synthesis, and validation also mentioned by Brereton et al (2007). These steps, we conjecture, are amenable to underpinning with IT systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%