2020
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-431-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MATS satellite mission – gravity wave studies by Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy

Abstract: Abstract. Global three-dimensional data are a key to understanding gravity waves in the mesosphere and lower thermosphere. MATS (Mesospheric Airglow/Aerosol Tomography and Spectroscopy) is a new Swedish satellite mission that addresses this need. It applies space-borne limb imaging in combination with tomographic and spectroscopic analysis to obtain gravity wave data on relevant spatial scales. Primary measurement targets are O2 atmospheric band dayglow and nightglow in the near infrared, and sunlight scattere… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in a recent model intercomparison Smith et al (2020) concluded that in free-running general circulation models too weak gravity wave forcing would be one of the main reasons for misrepresentations of the SSAO. Still, because our gravity wave observations do not provide any directional information, the magnitudes of net gravity wave momentum flux and of net gravity wave drag remain an open issue that needs to be addressed by better global observations providing information about the full 3D structure of gravity waves (see also, for example, Preusse et al, 2014;Ern et al, 2017;Gumbel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, in a recent model intercomparison Smith et al (2020) concluded that in free-running general circulation models too weak gravity wave forcing would be one of the main reasons for misrepresentations of the SSAO. Still, because our gravity wave observations do not provide any directional information, the magnitudes of net gravity wave momentum flux and of net gravity wave drag remain an open issue that needs to be addressed by better global observations providing information about the full 3D structure of gravity waves (see also, for example, Preusse et al, 2014;Ern et al, 2017;Gumbel et al, 2020).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First observations of the SAO winds were made by rocketsondes and radars at single stations in the tropics (e.g., Reed, 1966;Groves, 1972;Hirota, 1978;Dunkerton, 1982;Hamilton, 1982;Palo and Avery, 1993), and observations at tropical stations are still continued (e.g., Gurubaran and Rajaram, 2001;Venkateswara Rao et al, 2012;Day and Mitchell, 2013;Kishore Kumar et al, 2014). Direct observations of the SAO winds from satellite were made, for example, by the High Resolution Doppler Imager (HRDI) aboard the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS) (e.g., Lieberman et al, 1993;Burrage et al, 1996) or by the Superconducting Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission Sounder (SMILES) instrument aboard the International Space Station (e.g., Baron et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the SABER observations in the stratopause region are roughly in agreement with lidar observations (e.g., Deepa et al, 2006;Antonita et al, 2007) that also cover only a certain part of the whole spectrum of gravity waves. Still, because our gravity wave observations do not provide any directional information, the magnitudes of net gravity wave momentum flux and of net gravity wave drag remain an open issue that needs to be addressed by better global observations providing information about the full 3D structure of gravity waves (see also, for example Preusse et al, 2014;Ern et al, 2017;Gumbel et al, 2020). Swinbank and Ortland, 2003;Randel et al, 2002Randel et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While all global MHD simulations provide the ionospheric plasma drift pattern and the electric field, often the resulting polar cap potential can be overestimated (e.g. Haiducek et al, 2017), or underestimated (e.g. Palmroth et al, 2005) compared to best available measurements.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%