[1] Temperature data obtained by the Cryogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere (CRISTA) are analyzed for gravity waves (GWs). Amplitude, phase and vertical wavelength are determined from detrended temperature height profiles. The retrieved phases are utilized to estimate the horizontal wavelengths. At 25 km altitude an equatorial maximum of horizontal wavelength with a decrease toward mid and high latitudes is found. Simultaneous estimates of both horizontal and vertical wavelengths and temperature amplitudes allow the direct calculation of GW momentum flux (MF) from satellite observations for the first time. However, histograms of horizontal wavelength distributions indicate severe undersampling which prevents the retrieval of the propagation directions of the waves, and suggests our MF estimates may be too low, particularly at the high latitudes. Therefore an empirical aliasing correction has been applied. A world map of MF at 25 km altitude shows high variability and pronounced source regions and deviates in structure from a map of GW variances at the same altitude. Results from the Warner and McIntyre GW parameterization scheme (three-part model) show better agreement with CRISTA MF estimates than with CRISTA squared GW amplitudes. Best agreement is found for low model launch levels. Large error ranges of the estimated MF values obtained in this paper could be substantially reduced by improved horizontal sampling in future satellite missions.

[1] In this work absolute values of gravity wave (GW) momentum flux are derived from global temperature measurements by the satellite instruments High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS) and Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER). Momentum fluxes in the stratosphere are derived for both instruments and for SABER in the whole mesosphere. The large-scale atmospheric background state is removed by a two-dimensional Fourier decomposition in longitude and time, covering even planetary-scale waves with periods as short as 1-2 days. Therefore, it is possible to provide global distributions of GW momentum flux from observations for the first time in the mesosphere. Seasonal as well as longer-term variations of the global momentum flux distribution are discussed. GWs likely contribute significantly to the equatorward tilt of the polar night jet and to the poleward tilt of the summertime mesospheric jet. Our results suggest that GWs can undergo large latitudinal shifts while propagating upward. In particular, GWs generated by deep convection in the subtropical monsoon regions probably contribute significantly to the mesospheric summertime wind reversal at mid-and high latitudes. Variations in the GW longitudinal distribution caused by those convectively generated GWs are still observed in the mesosphere and could be important for the generation of the quasi two-day wave. Indications for quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) induced variations of GW momentum flux are found in the subtropics. Also variations at time scales of about one 11-year solar cycle are observed and might indicate a negative correlation between solar flux and GW momentum flux.Citation: Ern, M., P. Preusse, J. C. Gille, C. L. Hepplewhite, M. G. Mlynczak, J. M. Russell III, and M. Riese (2011), Implications for atmospheric dynamics derived from global observations of gravity wave momentum flux in stratosphere and mesosphere,

Recent observational and theoretical studies of the global properties of small-scale atmospheric gravity waves have highlighted the global effects of these waves on the circulation from the surface to the middle atmosphere. The effects of gravity waves on the large-scale circulation have long been treated via parametrizations in both climate and weather-forecasting applications. In these parametrizations, key parameters describe the global distributions of gravity-wave momentum flux, wavelengths and frequencies. Until recently, global observations could not define the required parameters because the waves are small in scale and intermittent in occurrence. Recent satellite and other global datasets with improved resolution, along with innovative analysis methods, are now providing constraints for the parametrizations that can improve the treatment of these waves in climate-prediction models. Research using very-highresolution global models has also recently demonstrated the capability to resolve gravity waves and their circulation effects, and when tested against observations these models show some very realistic properties. Here we review recent studies on gravitywave effects in stratosphere-resolving climate models, recent observations and analysis methods that reveal global patterns in gravity-wave momentum fluxes and results of very-high-resolution model studies, and we outline some future research requirements to improve the treatment of these waves in climate simulations.

[1] The Cryogenic Infrared Spectrometers and Telescopes for the Atmosphere (CRISTA) instrument measured stratospheric temperatures and trace species concentrations with high precision and spatial resolution during two missions. The measuring technique is infrared limb-sounding of optically thin emissions. In a general approach, we investigate the applicability of the technique to measure gravity waves (GWs) in the retrieved temperature data. It is shown that GWs with wavelengths of the order of 100-200 km horizontally can be detected. The results are applicable to any instrument using the same technique. We discuss additional constraints inherent to the CRISTA instrument. The vertical field of view and the influence of the sampling and retrieval imply that waves with vertical wavelengths $3-5 km or larger can be retrieved. Global distributions of GW fluctuations were extracted from temperature data measured by CRISTA using Maximum Entropy Method (MEM) and Harmonic Analysis (HA), yielding height profiles of vertical wavelength and peak amplitude for fluctuations in each scanned profile. The method is discussed and compared to Fourier transform analyses and standard deviations. Analysis of data from the first mission reveals large GW amplitudes in the stratosphere over southernmost South America. These waves obey the dispersion relation for linear two-dimensional mountain waves (MWs). The horizontal structure on 6 November 1994 is compared to temperature fields calculated by the Pennsylvania State University (PSU)/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) mesoscale model (MM5). It is demonstrated that precise knowledge of the instrument's sensitivity is essential. Particularly good agreement is found at the southern tip of South America where the MM5 accurately reproduces the amplitudes and phases of a large-scale wave with 400 km horizontal wavelength. Targeted ray-tracing simulations allow us to interpret some of the observed wave features. A companion paper will discuss MWs on a global scale and estimates the fraction that MWs contribute to the total GW energy (Preusse et al., in preparation, 2002).

International audienceFor the first time, a formal comparison is made between gravity wave momentum fluxes in models and those derived from observations. Although gravity waves occur over a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, the focus of this paper is on scales that are being parameterized in present climate models, sub-1000-km scales. Only observational methods that permit derivation of gravity wave momentum fluxes over large geographical areas are discussed, and these are from satellite temperature measurements, constant-density long-duration balloons, and high-vertical-resolution radiosonde data. The models discussed include two high-resolution models in which gravity waves are explicitly modeled, Kanto and the Community Atmosphere Model, version 5 (CAM5), and three climate models containing gravity wave parameterizations, MAECHAM5, Hadley Centre Global Environmental Model 3 (HadGEM3), and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) model. Measurements generally show similar flux magnitudes as in models, except that the fluxes derived from satellite measurements fall off more rapidly with height. This is likely due to limitations on the observable range of wavelengths, although other factors may contribute. When one accounts for this more rapid fall off, the geographical distribution of the fluxes from observations and models compare reasonably well, except for certain features that depend on the specification of the nonorographic gravity wave source functions in the climate models. For instance, both the observed fluxes and those in the high-resolution models are very small at summer high latitudes, but this is not the case for some of the climate models. This comparison between gravity wave fluxes from climate models, high-resolution models, and fluxes derived from observations indicates that such efforts offer a promising path toward improving specifications of gravity wave sources in climate models