The Maturity of Usability Maturity Models

Carvajal, Carmen L.; Moreno, Ana

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_7

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The topics with the least number of references with empirical evidence are "usability evaluation" with two of the six articles, "key people" with two of the five articles and "pilot project" with one of the four articles referencing it. In our opinion, the lack of empirical evidence regarding the topic of "usability evaluation" is due to the fact that usability maturity models present deficiencies such as the lack of guidelines for their application and the absence of explicit recommendations to improve usability maturity [51]. It is important to note that for the topics "key people" and "pilot project" the other three references that support it are articles on the authors' experiences when integrating usability into practice, which would also indirectly be supported by evidence.…”

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Best Practices on the Integration of Usability at the Organizational Level: A Review

Carvajal¹,

Moreno²,

Vergara³

2023

Proceedings of the 21th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI 2023): “Leaders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes existing practices or guides in the literature for software organizations to improve the usability of their applications. The selected research method is the synthesis of qualitative data through a thematic synthesis. In this research, different recommendations were recovered to achieve the incorporation of usability at the organizational level, mainly derived from case studies. As a result, 13 topics grouped into 5 higher order topics have been obtained. These topics summarize the important and necessary aspects, to not only achieve usable software projects as a result, but to that usability is present as part of the essence of the organization. One of the main contributions of this work is the model of interrelation between the themes identified in this work. This model presents the existing knowledge in the literature on good practices to integrate usability at the corporate level.

show abstract

Section: Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

Best Practices on the Integration of Usability at the Organizational Level: A Review

Carvajal¹,

Moreno²,

Vergara³

2023

Proceedings of the 21th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (LACCEI 2023): “Leaders

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…HF maturity models. It is pertinent to clarify that a number of HF maturity models have been developed (Carvajal & Moreno, 2017;Del Giudice, Hale, & Johnston, 2015;Jokela & Lalli, 2003;J. Mitchell, 2015;Nickleby HFE Ltd, 2002;Sherwood-Jones, Earthy, Bowler, Taylor, & Forster, 1999), and these should not be confused with the proposed tool.…”

Section: Uncertaintymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Narrative Review of FDA Human Factors Validation Requirement: The Needs of Key Stakeholders and Proposal of an Industry (Human Factors Service Providers) Maturity Assessment Tool

Rojas

Cosler

Santos

2019

Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As part of a comprehensive Quality System Regulation (QSR), the human factors (HF) validation requirement by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a relatively recent topic. Multiple issues and bottlenecks have emerged since the publication of the draft guidance in 2011. The scientific literature on the topic of ‘FDA HF validation requirement’ is mostly focused on HF methods to ensure success from that perspective. However, the development of across-the-board strategies that can address other critical factors is necessary. No previous scientific research has outlined and addressed the problems considering the QSR and the needs of key stakeholders. For that purpose, this effort presents a narrative review of how the HF requirement for medical devices and combination products developed, as well as the issues and the interventions that have taken place to address the bottlenecks. Some essential considerations such as notorious knowledge-based and process-based gaps are discussed. Similarly, because of the demands of a changing QSR, attention is brought to the need to align key stakeholders, namely manufacturers and HF service providers (HFSPs). Also, the development of an industry (HFSPs) maturity assessment tool and future research for that purpose are proposed.

show abstract

A Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Models: Theoretical Comparison in The Smart Manufacturing Sector

Elhusseiny,

Crispim

2024

Procedia Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Maturity of Usability Maturity Models

Cited by 7 publications

References 10 publications

Best Practices on the Integration of Usability at the Organizational Level: A Review

Best Practices on the Integration of Usability at the Organizational Level: A Review

A Narrative Review of FDA Human Factors Validation Requirement: The Needs of Key Stakeholders and Proposal of an Industry (Human Factors Service Providers) Maturity Assessment Tool

A Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Models: Theoretical Comparison in The Smart Manufacturing Sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About