1967
DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177698710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Maximum Deviation of Sample Spectral Densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key step in the proof of Lemma 3 is to follow an example in page 315 of Zygmund (2002) by explicitly constructing a covariance matrix Σ, or equivalently the corresponding spectral density, for which the bias of the banding estimatorΣ B k is much larger than k −2β . Lemma 4 is an extension of a major result in Woodroofe and Van Ness (1967).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A key step in the proof of Lemma 3 is to follow an example in page 315 of Zygmund (2002) by explicitly constructing a covariance matrix Σ, or equivalently the corresponding spectral density, for which the bias of the banding estimatorΣ B k is much larger than k −2β . Lemma 4 is an extension of a major result in Woodroofe and Van Ness (1967).…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Only a brief proof is given here. For more details, refer to Woodroofe and Van Ness (1967). According to (49), we have that…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the same argument as in Woodroofe and Van Ness [40] (see also [43, p. 118]), we have the inequality…”
Section: Proof Ifmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…is continuously differentiable. We shall use results of Woodroofe and Van Ness (1967) to estimate the magnitude of 6*. However, their results are for a different type of estimator and so we must first approximate sN(,fj, h) by an estimator of the appropriate type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%