1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00866413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The May?October energy budget of a Scots pine plantation at Hartheim, Germany

Abstract: An observed decrease in forest ET in July and August was clearly associated with low rainfall and increased soil water deficit. The OPEC system required only modest technical supervision. and generated a data yield of 99.5% over the period DOY 144-288. The documented verification and precision of this energy budget appears to be unmatched by any other long-term forest study reported to date.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, annual mean actual evapotranspiration E is the annual mean potential evapotranspiration reduced by ε (Eqns 8 and 9). This simple picture tends to underestimate the effects of limited water availability on the reduction of latent heat fluxes, because observations often indicate not only a stagnation but a significant reduction of latent heat flux due to stomatal closure under limited soil water conditions (Jarvis & McNaughton, 1986;Gay et al, 1996).…”
Section: Surface Fluxes and Energy Balancesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…2, annual mean actual evapotranspiration E is the annual mean potential evapotranspiration reduced by ε (Eqns 8 and 9). This simple picture tends to underestimate the effects of limited water availability on the reduction of latent heat fluxes, because observations often indicate not only a stagnation but a significant reduction of latent heat flux due to stomatal closure under limited soil water conditions (Jarvis & McNaughton, 1986;Gay et al, 1996).…”
Section: Surface Fluxes and Energy Balancesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Therefore, we also tested air temperature measured just above the canopy (at 30 m TH, RE, NO; at 24 m WS) as a proxy for biomass temperature (e.g. Gay et al 1996). A careful estimation of wet biomass is indicated because this parameter can easily change the magnitude of J veg (Eq.…”
Section: Biomass Heat Storage Change J Vegmentioning
confidence: 99%