This article joins recent ethnographies of written documents which shed light on embedded practices and codes in and through which writing is produced and consumed. The article explores the linguistic ideology of writing through examining inscriptions made in a visitor book in a war commemoration museum in Jerusalem, Israel. These settings supply a dual ideological framework, fusing the modern ideologies of authenticity and national commemoration. Under attention are the physical affordances and circumstances of the visitor book and how they contribute to an "authentic" mode of commemoration-cum-participation via inscribing, where language ideology and national ideology reinforce each other. The analysis suggests that the category "writing" is reductionist, and that under embodied sensibilities it should better be viewed as an array of textual, para-textual, and non-textual visual signs that are fused into the production of materialized hybrid inscriptions. Further, the situatedness and corporeality of inscribing practices carries far reaching semiotic implications, including the transformation of the ontic state of "texts" into that of symbols, calling for the rematerialization of inscribing. [handwriting, language ideologies, museum, commemoration, visitor book] Writing Situated I t is no news that writing can be an embodied and an embodying ideological practice in and of itself. This appreciation raises inquiries concerning the ecologies wherein writing amounts to an ideologically indoctrinating practice, and the codes that illustrate how writing is indeed charged. In this article I explore writing practices and the codes they produce in a particular cultural site, namely a commemorative visitor book, with the intention of showing how national ideology is inscribed and embodied in an institutional setting. That is, how in a particular setting inscriptions are produced, presented, and consumed as an ideological mode of linguistic communication, or more generally, as a value-laden system of signs.The exploration is a reaction to Keith Basso's (1974) formative proposal, urging for ethnographic explorations of written materials of sorts, and of the social practices and circumstances in and through which they have been produced. The exploration joins a recent move towards researching the sociosemiotics of writing-and of literacy at large-via ethnographic sensibilities and approaches. Such studies, pursued mostly by linguistic anthropologists (