1911
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1911.tb00047.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Mental Ability of ‘Backward’ Children

Abstract: Out of this arise many questions of great importance. 1. General character of the investigation. The investigations described in this paper have been carried out on children only j u s t De Sanctis, '' Types et degrbs d'insuffisance mentsle," A n d e p8yChOl. 1906, 70. J. of Psych. IV 18 a Ann6e paychol., op. cit.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1913
1913
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers, therefore, have reconsidered Galton's hypothesis. For instance, in his recent review on sensory discrimination and intelligence, Deary (1994) vindicated Galton's senses-intelligence hypothesis by arguing that early experimental researchers' dismissals of this hypothesis originated mainly from selectively emphasizing disconfirming results from early studies (e.g., Galton, 1883;Sharp, 1898Sharp, -1899Wissler, 1901) while neglecting results of moderately positive correlations between sensory and intellectual measures reported at about the same time (e.g., Abelson, 1911;Burt, 1909Burt, -1910Carey, 1914Carey, -19151915-1917Spearman, 1904). Admitting that the sensory measures are clearly inferior to more complex mental tests for the measurement of intelligence, Deary (!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers, therefore, have reconsidered Galton's hypothesis. For instance, in his recent review on sensory discrimination and intelligence, Deary (1994) vindicated Galton's senses-intelligence hypothesis by arguing that early experimental researchers' dismissals of this hypothesis originated mainly from selectively emphasizing disconfirming results from early studies (e.g., Galton, 1883;Sharp, 1898Sharp, -1899Wissler, 1901) while neglecting results of moderately positive correlations between sensory and intellectual measures reported at about the same time (e.g., Abelson, 1911;Burt, 1909Burt, -1910Carey, 1914Carey, -19151915-1917Spearman, 1904). Admitting that the sensory measures are clearly inferior to more complex mental tests for the measurement of intelligence, Deary (!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, whereas Brown defined the reliability coefficient as the correlation between scores on repeated administration of the same instrument, Kelley (1921) defined the reliability coefficient as the coefficient of correlation between comparable tests. Meanwhile, Abelson (1911) used Spearman's (1910) proof to derive a formula for what was coined by Kelley 5 years later as the index of reliability.…”
Section: History Of the Internal Consistency Reliability Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported below are based on data obtained from a cancellation test developed by Vos (1988). The test is known as the Bourdon-Vos test and is actually a modification for children of the Mare, 1947) that was originally proposed by Abelson (1911).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%