1949
DOI: 10.1042/bj0440179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The measurement of radioactive sulphur (35S) in biological material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1952
1952
1961
1961

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…obtained on the same sample of tissue by the Canius bomb procedure. Values obtained by this method for the sulphur content of Wistar albino rat (150-165 g.) tissues showed good agreement with values previously reported by Young et al (1949) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…obtained on the same sample of tissue by the Canius bomb procedure. Values obtained by this method for the sulphur content of Wistar albino rat (150-165 g.) tissues showed good agreement with values previously reported by Young et al (1949) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This agrees with Folch & Lees (1951), who found that methionine resisted oxidation with nitric acid, but was completely oxidized by aqua regia. Young et al (1949) also found that the Pirie method gave low values for certain sulphur compounds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sul fur.-Young et al (193) have measured S35 in biological materials by oxidizing with the Carius method followed by precipitation of benzidine sul fate which is then measured in an ionization chamber. Mean recovery of 535 was 99 per cent and the standard deviation of a single measurement was 2.8 per cent.…”
Section: Chemical Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radioactive sulphate was separated in the form of benzidine sulphate preparatory to the measurement of its 85S content. Although detailed studies of this method of measuring 35S have already been reported (Henriques, Kistiakowsky, Margnetti & Schneider, 1946;Young, Edson & McCarter, 1949), it was necessary to modify these procedures in order to meet the requirements of the present investigation.…”
Section: Measurement Of 35smentioning
confidence: 99%