1999
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Measurement of Unemployment: An Empirical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
171
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
12
171
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The UPR is thought to better capture unemployment in populations featuring discouraged workers, who are not considered a part of the labor force and are thus excluded from the UR (Jones & Riddell, 1999). Given the economic recession in the United States in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which is the period during which lifetime asthma would have occurred in our cohort, the UPR may be a more appropriate measure than the UR in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UPR is thought to better capture unemployment in populations featuring discouraged workers, who are not considered a part of the labor force and are thus excluded from the UR (Jones & Riddell, 1999). Given the economic recession in the United States in the late 1980s and early 1990s, which is the period during which lifetime asthma would have occurred in our cohort, the UPR may be a more appropriate measure than the UR in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distinction between being "unemployed" and "out of the labor force", for instance, is based on self-reported job-search behavior, which may range from almost nonexistent to very active (see e.g. Jones and Riddell, 1999). The distinction between employment and non-employment is perhaps not more firmly established.…”
Section: B4 How Subjective Is Involuntary Part-time Work?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is the existence of different layers of EPL for different jobs and workers, is especially acute. 12 We further examine this in the next Section.…”
Section: Flows From Employment Into Unemploymentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, 2012), so D stands as a T x1 vector of year dummies. The dependent variable h it denotes one of two different outcomes in two different regressions: in the first specification -the flow from employment to unemployment h EU it -, it takes value 1 when an employed individual becomes unemployed, and 0 when she remains employed; in the second -the flow from unemployment to employment h UE it -, h it takes value 1 when an unemployed individual 9 Moreover, as job searching is not always a precisely observed concept in labor force surveys, there is a grey area in the definition of the boundary between inactivity and unemployment that makes the identification of flows between unemployment and inactivity a bit problematic (See Jones and Riddell, 1999, 2002, and Garrido and Toharia, 2004. Active job search in the EU-LFS is defined as the fulfillment of one of the following steps to find a job: having been in contact with a public employment office to find work, whoever took the initiative (renewing registration for administrative reasons only is not an active step), having been in contact with a private agency (temporary work agency, firm specializing in recruitment, etc.)…”
Section: Measuring Flows By Socio-demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%