1950
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1950.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mechanics of large bubbles rising through extended liquids and through liquids in tubes

Abstract: Part I describes measurements of the shape and rate of rise of air bubbles varying in volume from 1·5 to 200 cm. 3 when they rise through nitrobenzene or water. Measurements of photographs of bubbles formed in nitrobenzene show that the greater part of the upper surface is always spherical. A theoretical discussion, based on the assumption that the pressure over the front of the bubble is the same as that in ideal hydrodynamic flow round a sphere, shows that the velocity of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
108
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 937 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretical predictions for F r exist in the range 0.328 − 0.369 [3,2,15,22,25] with Dumitrescu's 0.351 being regarded as the most accurate [4]. The stability of large diameter bubbles is less well understood [5,1,12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical predictions for F r exist in the range 0.328 − 0.369 [3,2,15,22,25] with Dumitrescu's 0.351 being regarded as the most accurate [4]. The stability of large diameter bubbles is less well understood [5,1,12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the previous research into the behaviour of Taylor bubbles has been motivated by their importance in industrial and engineering settings, particularly as components of two-phase 'slug flow' (Nicklin et al 1962, Fabré & Liné 1992. This work has included theoretical studies (Dumitrescu 1943;Davies & Taylor 1950;Goldsmith & Mason 1962;Brown 1965;Batchelor 1967), experimental studies (Davies & Taylor 1950;Goldsmith & Mason 1962;White & Beardmore 1962;Campos & Guedes de Carvalho 1988;Viana et al 2003;Nogueira et al 2006) and numerical studies (Taha & Cui 2006;Zheng et al 2007;Feng 2008;Kang et al 2010). A major goal of previous work has been to quantify the physical controls on the ascent velocity v b of Taylor bubbles (recently reviewed by Viana et al 2003) and the nature of the velocity field in the liquid around them (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the angle of orientation is equal to 90°, the sliding velocity of the bubble increases with a slope more important than the two previous up to 39 ms where it will have reached a peak of 13.07 cm/s, then it decreases and is stabilized along a stage until the detachment where it leaves the wall with a velocity of 11.41 cm/s; for the three cases, we have a disturbance around 6ms then velocity decrease and increase again. In all the cases, the profile of the sliding velocity has the pace of a bubble rising in a liquid, the velocity progresses then tends towards a velocity limits of 21 cm/s, the latter is determined by the equation (7) given by Davies and Taylor (1950), it corresponds to a rise of a bubble without sliding on the wall and is higher than all velocities at the time of the detachment of the bubble.…”
Section: Sliding Velocitymentioning
confidence: 94%