2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mediating role of corporate governance between public governance and logistics performance: International evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LPI consists of six different indicators reflecting main drivers of countries logistics performance: (1) the efficiency of customs and border management clearance ("Customs"); (2) the quality of trade and transport infrastructure (Infrastructure"); (3) the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (Ease of arranging shipments"); (4) the competence and quality of logistics services-trucking, forwarding, and customs brokerage ("Quality of logistics In the literature, the moderating role of institutional quality seeking to explore the complexity of economic corridors and their impact on logistics performance to the best of our knowledge, has not been analyzed yet. Authors focused on moderating role of corruption (Larson, 2020;Uca et al, 2016), competitiveness, institutions (Haavisto & Vaillancourt, 2017;Halaszovich et al, 2020;Soh et al, 2021;Uyar et al, 2021), trade volumes (Uca et al, 2016), economic growth (Civelek et al, 2015) and other factors affecting logistics performance, but not the impact of economic corridors to logistics performance. However, authors emphasized the importance of institutional quality to be significant for the development of economic corridors (De & Iyengar, 2014) and in the context of BRI, the linkage between regional institutions and participation in Global value chains (GVC) appeared to be significant for encouraging firms to participate in GVCs (Ge et al, 2020); or the importance of conditions of institutional quality for attracting foreign direct investment (Aibai et al, 2019); of the role of institutional quality in the field of environmental protection (Wu et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Concept and Main Indicators Of Logistics Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LPI consists of six different indicators reflecting main drivers of countries logistics performance: (1) the efficiency of customs and border management clearance ("Customs"); (2) the quality of trade and transport infrastructure (Infrastructure"); (3) the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (Ease of arranging shipments"); (4) the competence and quality of logistics services-trucking, forwarding, and customs brokerage ("Quality of logistics In the literature, the moderating role of institutional quality seeking to explore the complexity of economic corridors and their impact on logistics performance to the best of our knowledge, has not been analyzed yet. Authors focused on moderating role of corruption (Larson, 2020;Uca et al, 2016), competitiveness, institutions (Haavisto & Vaillancourt, 2017;Halaszovich et al, 2020;Soh et al, 2021;Uyar et al, 2021), trade volumes (Uca et al, 2016), economic growth (Civelek et al, 2015) and other factors affecting logistics performance, but not the impact of economic corridors to logistics performance. However, authors emphasized the importance of institutional quality to be significant for the development of economic corridors (De & Iyengar, 2014) and in the context of BRI, the linkage between regional institutions and participation in Global value chains (GVC) appeared to be significant for encouraging firms to participate in GVCs (Ge et al, 2020); or the importance of conditions of institutional quality for attracting foreign direct investment (Aibai et al, 2019); of the role of institutional quality in the field of environmental protection (Wu et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Concept and Main Indicators Of Logistics Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this conceptual framework by institutional quality, we mean government effectiveness that captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the quality of the civil service and the degree of its independence from political pressures (Busse & Hefeker, 2007) agrees that bureaucratic quality is closely associated with institutional strength of a particular country. Uyar et al (2021) highlights that the main determinants of logistics performance are related to public governance. The authors found that government effectiveness, as a proxy for institutional quality, can foster countries logistics performance through improvement in infrastructure as well as by formulating of sound and precise customs clearance process.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework For Evaluating the Impact Of Economic C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important point of the principle of accountability as in the formulation of the article above lies in the form of responsibility, namely that all activities carried out must be accountable (Uyar et al, 2021). Likewise in the context of implementing auction activities, all parties involved in the auction, especially the Auction Center as the organizer of the auction, are obligated to be accountable for the results of the sale and purchase of goods by auction (Tan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Scope Of Accountability Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good corporate governance can be helpful in the monitoring function so that management can make effective decisions (Shahid & Abbas, 2019). This effectiveness can be demonstrated by lower default risk (Ali, Liu, & Su, 2018), efficiency (Peng, Zhang, Zhong, & Li, 2021), and good performance (Li, Crook, Andreeva, & Tang, 2021;Peng et al, 2021;Uyar, Fernandes, & Kuzey, 2021). The application of good governance can create good corporate value through monitoring, information dissemination/production, investor recognition (Lehmann, 2019), and media coverage (Carlini, Cucinelli, Previtali, & Soana, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%