The Meetings of Disaster Victims as a Space for Developing Community Resilience

Silva, Jane Ciambele Souza da; Carvalho, Ricardo José Matos de; Pimenta, Alícia Fernada da Silva; Carvalho, Paulo Victor Rodrigues de

doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.222

Cited by 3 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This type of approach was in line with case studies and field studies such as observation, documentation and categorization of the phenomena. These data was elicited from interview (Perera et al, 2017;Pollock et al, 2019;Rahman and Kausel, 2012;Drolet et al, 2015;O'Neill et al, 2016), semi-structured interviews (Houston et al, 2019), group interview (Alaedini et al, 2011;Arneson et al, 2017;Comes et al, 2019), in-depth interviews (Gultom and Joyce, 2014;Cretney, 2016), focus group (Golding et al, 2020;Mosley et al, 2012), field work (Murphy et al, 2014), forum design (Wells et al, 2013;Berke et al, 2011;Dufty, 2017), content analysis (Firdhous and Karuratane, 2018;Herath et al, 2020;Hong et al, 2018), participatory action research (Miles, 2018), document analysis (Sulaiman and Fernando, 2019), ethnographic research (McIlvaine-Newsad et al, 2020), constructivist research (Bacud, 2018), meeting through ergonomics framework (da Silva et al, 2015) and critical review of the literature (Satria et al, 2012). A SLR of community disaster resilience One-third of the studies were quantitative.…”

Section: Results Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All papers are present in googlescholar.com and in one or some among the following 132 sources which can be classified into three groups. The first group includes 3–50 papers, including: researchgate.net (Murphy, 2020), search.proquest.com (Doberstein et al , 2019), ebscohost.com (Deshmukh and Hastak, 2012), europepmc.org (da Silva et al , 2015), pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov and safetylit.org (Cui et al , 2018), academia.edu (Comes et al , 2019), econpapers.repec.org (Chandra et al , 2013), semanticscholar.org (Cha et al , 2016), core.ac.uk and Elsevier (Carlile and Christensen, 2004), Taylor & Francis (Canyon et al , 2015), mdpi.com, ncbi.nlm.nih.gov and Springer (Berke et al , 2011), cabdirect.org (Barameda and Barameda, 2011), ingentaconnect.com (Bacud, 2018), cambridge.org (Alshehri et al , 2013) and Wiley Online Library (Alaedini et al , 2011). The second one comprises 21 sources, namely: search.informit.org, knowledge.aidr.org.au, Citeseer, American Public Health Association, ascelibrary.org, cphd.ph.ucla.edu, cyberleninka.org, Eric, espace.library.uq.edu.au, etc.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All papers are present in googlescholar.com and in one or some among the following 132 sources which can be classified into three groups. The first group includes 3-50 papers, including: researchgate.net (Murphy, 2020), search.proquest.com (Doberstein et al, 2019), ebscohost.com (Deshmukh & Hastak, 2012), europepmc.org (da Silva et al, 2015), pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov and safetylit.org (Cui et al, 2018); academia.edu (Comes et al, 2019), econpapers.repec.org (Chandra et al, 2013), semanticscholar.…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Selected Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies of this area report stories of social development (Barameda & Barameda, 2011;Arneson et al, 2017), deals with social change (da Silva et al, 2015), the meetings of disaster victims as a space for developing community resilience ( Drolet et al, 2015), innovative community practices (Golding et al, 2020), community learning through adversity and disaster (Igwe & Wordu, 2016), humanity and social sciences (Nicholls et al, 2015), applied social science (Patel & Gleason, 2018), social cohesion and resilience across communities (Townshend et al, 2015) and organization (Burnard, K.J. & Bhamra, R., 2019).…”

Section: Disciplines Relating To Community Disaster Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…at disaster prevention and management regarding natural hazards and the resilience to a potential disaster event(Odiase et al, 2019) and disaster victims(da Silva et al, 2015) at all ages which engage child-oriented preventive program…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A systematic literature review of community disaster resilience: main and related research areas and agendas

Upadhyay

Sa-ngiamwibool

2021

CRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to characterize the main research areas of published works, identify the disciplines that associated with the works and propose research agendas for future inquiries, based on a systematic literature review that encompasses 89 research papers from 2010 to 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis review commenced with the definition of the three research questions, and subsequently three steps were followed: (1) defining criteria for research paper selection; (2) specifying the data bases and selecting the papers based on the criteria and (3) data analysis, conclusion and discussion of selected papers. The search was limited to the selection of research papers in English, focusing on “community disaster resilience” which is the subject of this review and referred to as keywords which were used for the online search for papers. All these three words must be present in the title of the selected papers.FindingsThe area “resilience management” and “disaster resilience assessment” accounted for 43% of the studies, and it indicates that research has emphasized the description of how community disaster resilience has been managed and assessed. Three disciplines relating to disaster resilience are disaster risk science, public health and environment, and it indicates that research has fostered core areas of community disaster resilience. Three key research agenda include a growing trend to describe successful efforts to avert a potentially catastrophic disaster through solution-based case studies; a paradigmatic shift and implementation of how communities could help the disaster victims recuperate from disasters.Research limitations/implicationsThis review is limited to the numbers of chosen papers, as only full papers were chosen. However, in order to establish more rigorous and inclusive results of the study, the numbers of citations of published papers to be chosen for future inquiry should be taken into account.Originality/valueThis present review originally investigated how the concept of disaster resilience has been applied at the community level and in related areas. As resilience is a multidisciplinary concept that has been investigated by several different disciplines, such as sustainability, psychology, economy and sociology, this study looked into how disciplines related to community disaster resilience to provide agenda for future inquiries. This study therefore characterized the main research areas of published works, identified the disciplines that associated with the works and proposed a research agenda for future inquiries.

show abstract

Section: Results Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of the Selected Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Disciplines Relating To Community Disaster Resiliencementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A systematic literature review of community disaster resilience: main and related research areas and agendas

Upadhyay

Sa-ngiamwibool

2021

CRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A fuzzy model to assess the resilience of Protection and Civil Defense Organizations

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resilience is the intrinsic ability of a system to adjust its functioning prior to, during, or following changes and disturbances, so that it can sustain required operations under expected and unexpected conditions. Protection and Civil Defense Organizations (PCDOs), communities and cities deal with disaster management involving routine, non-routine and even unpredictable/unforeseen situations with varying degrees of complexity. It is important that such organizations continually assess their resilience, enable them to learn on their weaknesses and real capacities to cope with emergency situations. This research aimed the development of an Organization Resilience Indicator System (ORIS) based on a fuzzy model to enable PCDOs self-assesses their resilience. Based on a literature review on organizational and community's resilience, a system of resilience indicators was defined. This system was validated by experts using fuzzy set theory to aggregate opinions in the development of a resilience ideal pattern. Then, the resilience of four PCDO organizations was self-evaluated. The results were accordingly to maturity level of the organizations evaluated, indicating that the ORIS is valuable to measure PCDOs resilience.

show abstract

Roadmap for the development of a resilience indicator system for protection and civil defense organizations: A literature review of the evidence

Santos

Carvalho

2020

WOR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Disasters are the result of adverse events that cause human, material, environmental, and economic and social damage. To deal with disaster management, prevention, response, and recovery organizations need a system of indicators to measure their resilience. OBJECTIVE: Develop a road map to select indicators of organizational, institutional and governmental resilience to be applied to evaluate the resilience of public Protection and Civil Defense Organizations (PCDOs) of developing countries. METHOD:A literature review on resilience indicators for disaster management using Scopus database, identifying and classifying the resilience indicators available in the scientific literature, to discuss the possibilities of their application in PCDOs. RESULTS:Resilience indicators for disaster management available in the literature have many diverse classifications and they were developed for the evaluation of communities' resilience. The literature review results also indicated that there is a lack of indicators to evaluate PCDOs' resilience.CONCLUSIONS: Indicators of the institutional, organizational and governmental categories identified in the review, originally developed for the evaluation of communities' resilience, can be used to compose a hybrid system of resilience indicators able to measure the resilience of PCDOs.

show abstract

The Meetings of Disaster Victims as a Space for Developing Community Resilience

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

A systematic literature review of community disaster resilience: main and related research areas and agendas

A systematic literature review of community disaster resilience: main and related research areas and agendas

A fuzzy model to assess the resilience of Protection and Civil Defense Organizations

Roadmap for the development of a resilience indicator system for protection and civil defense organizations: A literature review of the evidence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About