“…In large part due to extensive DNA barcoding efforts, such as done through the Census of Marine Life (McIntyre, 2010) and a growing richness of reference libraries (i.e., Barcode of Life Data Systems, BOLD 1 ), it is becoming increasingly feasible to use barcoding instead of, or in addition to, morphology to describe biodiversity in marine ecosystems. Yet to date, there are only a few studies focusing on meroplankton at the species level, and even fewer from the high latitudes (i.e., Stanwell-Smith et al, 1999;Sewell, 2005;Fetzer and Arntz, 2008;Bowden et al, 2009;Heimeier et al, 2010;Sewell and Jury, 2011;Gallego et al, 2015;Silberberger et al, 2016;Brandner et al, 2017). The Pacific Arctic region is no exception; although both benthic (Grebmeier et al, 2006;Bluhm et al, 2009;Grebmeier, 2012;Iken et al, 2018) and pelagic (Hopcroft et al, 2010;Eisner et al, 2013;Ershova et al, 2015a;Pinchuk and Eisner, 2017) summer communities of the Chukchi Sea, particularly on the United States side, have been studied extensively and described in great detail during the last decades (Day et al, 2013;Sigler et al, 2017), meroplankton has been largely overlooked, with FIGURE 1 | Major oceanographic features of the Chukchi Sea (modified from Stabeno et al, 2018) and locations of macrobenthic hotspots as defined by Grebmeier et al (2015b).…”