2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mesosphere and lower thermosphere of Titan revealed by Cassini/UVIS stellar occultations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
153
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
19
153
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An infrared limb spectrum taken by the Voyager I spacecraft produced the first vertical abundance profile of the gas, with a vertical resolution of ∼200 km (Coustenis et al 1991). Hidayat et al (1997) and Marten et al (2002) CN and HC 15 N using the CIRS instrument (Vinatier et al 2007), as well as extensive mapping of the vertical and horizontal distributions of HCN (Teanby et al 2007;Vinatier et al 2010;Koskinen et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An infrared limb spectrum taken by the Voyager I spacecraft produced the first vertical abundance profile of the gas, with a vertical resolution of ∼200 km (Coustenis et al 1991). Hidayat et al (1997) and Marten et al (2002) CN and HC 15 N using the CIRS instrument (Vinatier et al 2007), as well as extensive mapping of the vertical and horizontal distributions of HCN (Teanby et al 2007;Vinatier et al 2010;Koskinen et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cassini observations revealed the presence of aerosols in multiple regions of the atmosphere, from the troposphere (7), stratosphere (8), and mesosphere (9,10) up to the thermosphere where the detection of large mass positive and particularly negative ions has been suggested to be the signature of aerosol formation (11)(12)(13)(14). During a recent flyby (T70), the Cassini spacecraft penetrated to deeper regions of Titan's thermosphere than usual, reaching altitudes close to 880 km that had not previously been sampled with in situ measurements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is stressed, however, that systematic errors in the utilized neutral number densities cannot explain the magnitude difference between modeled and observed electron fluxes. First, the utilized densities (or calibration factor) match those derived from measurements by the Cassini Ultraviolet Spectrograph (Koskinen et al 2011), as well as those inferred from the Cassini Attitude and Articulation Control Subsystem and the Huygens Atmosphere Structure Instrument (Strobel 2010). Second, by systematically changing the utilized densities by ±50% removes the agreement with observed profile shapes, regarding both the model output of suprathermal electron fluxes and thermal electron number densities (see Vigren et al 2013).…”
Section: Comparisons Of Modeled and Observed Electron Intensitiesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(2012) used a calibration factor of 2.9 (see also Koskinen et al 2011). While using as default the correction factor 2.9, we present in Section 3 also P e,EI,M /P e,EI,O ratios obtained from the use of a calibration factor of 2.1 (slightly reduced from the value of 2.2 suggested by Teolis et al 2015).…”
Section: Calculations Of Electron-impact Electron Production Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%