2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Methane Diurnal Variation and Microseepage Flux at Gale Crater, Mars as Constrained by the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter and Curiosity Observations

Abstract: The upper bound of 50 parts per trillion by volume for Mars methane above 5 km established by the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter, substantially lower than the 410 parts per trillion by volume average measured overnight by the Curiosity Rover, places a strong constraint on the daytime methane flux at the Gale crater. We propose that these measurements may be largely reconciled by the inhibition of mixing near the surface overnight, whereby methane emitted from the subsurface accumulates within meters of the surface … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
49
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, summarizing the results of the previous observations, the source of Mars methane should be spatially restricted but also temporarily restricted with potential sources in form of seepages (Yung et al, 2018): from micro-seepages, (Etiope et al, 2015;Moores et al, 2019), mini-seepages (Etiope et al, 2015) to macro-seepages, (Oehler et al, 2017). Furthermore, the different amounts detected in spikes Table 1, seasonal oscillations and non-detections are compatible with geological seepage dynamics that involve changes in gradient of pressure and in the permeability of rocks (Etiope and Oehler, 2019).…”
Section: Instead the 3 Years Measurements Of Mars Surface Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In fact, summarizing the results of the previous observations, the source of Mars methane should be spatially restricted but also temporarily restricted with potential sources in form of seepages (Yung et al, 2018): from micro-seepages, (Etiope et al, 2015;Moores et al, 2019), mini-seepages (Etiope et al, 2015) to macro-seepages, (Oehler et al, 2017). Furthermore, the different amounts detected in spikes Table 1, seasonal oscillations and non-detections are compatible with geological seepage dynamics that involve changes in gradient of pressure and in the permeability of rocks (Etiope and Oehler, 2019).…”
Section: Instead the 3 Years Measurements Of Mars Surface Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Detections of tiny amounts of CH4 in Mars' present-day atmosphere have been reported (e.g. Webster et al 2018), although these detections do not all agree with one another and are in tension with models that predict lower methane abundance, and also lower methane abundance variability, than has been reported (Zahnle et al 2011, Mischna et al 2011, Korablev et al 2019, Zahnle & Catling 2019, Moores et al 2019. Separate from its potential to warm Mars, methane can also serve as the feedstock for photochemical production of complex organic matter -hazes and soots.…”
Section: Causes and Effects Of Methane Release On Early Marsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is considerable debate in the community about the validity and robustness of detections of atmospheric methane (CH 4 ) on Mars. Detections and nondetections of atmospheric CH 4 have been reported using data collected by satellites (Formisano et al., 2004; Fonti & Marzo, 2010; Geminale et al., 2008, 2011; Giuranna et al., 2019), Earth‐based telescopes (Krasnopolsky, 2007, 2011, 2012; Krasnopolsky et al., 1997, 2004; Mumma et al., 2009; Villanueva et al., 2013), and in situ instruments (Moores et al., 2019; Webster et al., 2015, 2018). This debate highlights the difficulty of measuring atmospheric CH 4 on Mars and the gaps in our current understanding of the production and loss terms that determine atmospheric CH 4 on Mars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%