We have recently shown that the requirements of several amino acids differ substantially when neonates are fed parenterally as opposed to enterally. Our first objective was to determine whether the tryptophan requirement was different in parenterally fed (IV fed /IV dose ) versus enterally fed (IG fed /IV dose ) piglets. Because of the extensive extraction of amino acids by the gut, our other objective was to determine whether the route of isotope administration [i.e. intragastric (IG fed /IG dose ) versus i.v. (IG fed / IV dose ) dose] affects the estimate of tryptophan requirement in enterally fed piglets. We used the indicator amino acid oxidation technique in piglets (10 Ϯ 0.5 d old, 2.79 Ϯ 0.28 kg) receiving a complete elemental diet for 6 d either intragastrically or intravenously. Piglets were randomly assigned to receive test diets containing one of seven levels of tryptophan. Due to physiologic immaturity and disease, premature infants often require TPN (1). The amino acid solutions currently used in TPN are mostly based on oral reference proteins, such as whole egg protein and human milk protein (2). Because nutrients infused parenterally bypass both liver and gut firstpass metabolism, the use of these amino acid solutions may be inappropriate for parenterally fed infants (2). For example, Bertolo et al. (3) showed that the parenteral threonine requirement of neonatal piglets was approximately 45% of the mean enteral requirement. In parenteral feeding, nutrients infused into a central vein bypass exclusive first-pass metabolism by the intestine and liver; these nutrients are therefore provided to nonsplanchnic organs in concentrations that are not modified by first-pass splanchnic metabolism. In piglets fed complete diets via a central or portal vein, we have previously shown that both routes of feeding led to extensive gut atrophy, and hence lowered intestinal metabolic capacity (4). These studies also demonstrated that in parenterally fed piglets, gut atrophy has a greater impact on nitrogen metabolism than bypass of first-pass liver metabolism (4, 5). In support of this conclusion,